TN: '02 Penfold's Bin 389 Cab-Shiraz

Quite some time ago I came across reports of this wine that described it as "the poor man's Grange", "excellent", and "a bargain from down under".

Now, I've never tasted the Penfold's Grange, but I'm well aware of the accolades it receives - even from parker. So I put a couple of these away in my cellar for about 6 months until I could resist no longer.

She-Who-Must-Be-Obeyed and I popped a cork on one the other eve, and let it stand for about 30 minutes. accompanying the wine were some simple hors douvres, just to keep the wine, and the wine tasters, honest. Lest you feel you've been misled into reading the rest of my ramblings, allow me to cut to the chase; we were underwhelmed by the wine. It managed an 84.5 on our household 'modified 100 point scale' - making it an "average to good" wine.

The color is a dark garnet. Dark to the point of being opaque, but not at all cloudy. No hints of any browning, good legs on the glass. The acid is in balance, and the wine is not overoaked; just a hint of oak on the nose - as I prefer. But both the nose and the palate lack. The nose, as I said, has some soft oak, hints of licorice, and just a trace of that 'winey' Cabernet aroma (again, which I prefer). Problem is, that's it - there just isn't enough nose. We suspected that maybe the wine hadn't been allowed to breathe long enough, so we replaced the cork in the bottle and tried another glass the next day at lunch. Slight improvement, but really the same result.

The palate is firm, with a medium finish. But again, both the palate and the nose lack any fruit character.

While the wine is respectable, we fail to find the superlatives that others have given the wine. Honeslty, we think the Koonunga Hill Shiraz-Cab is a slightly more enjoyable wine, and a much better value.

Of course, your mileage may vary.

Cheers,

Reply to
Ric
Loading thread data ...

First of all, the "poor man's Grange" comment I've been told refers to the fact that the used barrels from the previous year's Grange are used for Bin 389. Certainly, stylistically there is no similarity whatsoever. Now, in the interests of full disclosure I'll reveal that Bin 389 is among my favorite Penfolds bottlings. It's tight in its youth, but comes into its own with 5-10 years of aging. I suspect that your bottle simply was too young for you to enjoy. The problem in my household is keeping SHMBO's hands off the Bin 389 long enough to age it the requisite time, but it is worth the struggle IMO. One caveat: I haven't had the '02, having been seriously put off by a tasting of Penfolds' '02s I attended last year, but I suspect that the Bin 389 was an exception (I didn't get to taste it) to the otherwise mint-heavy stable of wines I tasted (Bin 707 and Bin 28 being among them).

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

What year did Penfolds not produce the 707 and instead use the grapes for 389 or perhaps another Bin? I thought that was 2002 but could be wrong.

Reply to
miles

2000. There may have been other years as well, but that's the vintage I'm aware of.
Reply to
Hal Burton

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.