TN: Lots of 40+ year old wines blind in Soho

Thursday night a nice group gathered at La Sirene/ Taureau on the theme Old er and Blind (40 years being minmum). A rainy day, but better than original forecast. Before heading to city I decided to double-decant my 2 bottles f or sediment, good thing I did as the ‘66 Beychevelle was a testament to t he longevity of TCA. I grabbed a last minute replacement, and headed to cit y.

We were in Taureau side of restaurant, but ordered from La Sirene menu. I t hought the sauteed baby octopus was tasty, but with wines I wouldn’t have ordered if menu had mentioned hot pepper (not to mention enough thyme for

20 dishes). The cassoulet seemed soupy and a bit disappointing compared to pass (though I didn’t get any Italian sausage as others did). But service was cheerful.

Ben had brought bags, and we labelled so that owner could answer questions.

Flight 1 RC1- Paul was quick with Bordeaux and 1970, I guessed St Julien, but then m issed with Beychevelle (this seemed elegant, so I was surprised when unveil ed). Tangy acids, resolved tannin, lots of cigarbox. 1970 Gruaud Larose B+

DW1- double decanted before I left home. Floral, slightly roasted fruit not es, plenty of oomph. Ramon got Italian, but then thought Southern Italy, an d I replied “the appellation on bottle is northern Italian.” Ben asked if Nebbiolo, and I replied “cellartracker says it’s Nebbiolo”- from m y evasive answers Chris nailed it, though it took a while to get vintage.19

58 Vallana "Campi Raudii Catulli Ara" Spanna B+

Flight 2 BG1 - fresh, young, tarry, good length. One of my favorite wines of the nig ht. Josh got Piedmont right off bat, and eventually Vietti. 1971 Vietti “ Localita Briacca” Barolo. A-

BG2- Full, rich, classic Bordeaux, black fruits and cigarbox 1966 Ducru-Bea ucaillou B+/A-

Flight 3 Paul felt PJ1 & PJ2 not interesting enough, so labelled piss and swill. Whi ch led to many strange comments I think for neighboring tables (“are you talking piss or swill”, “piss is #1”, “let me just focus on swill ”).

Piss- Tired, roasted, smoky, seen better days, someone got “old Piedmont ” early. 1971 Ceretto “Zonchetta” Barolo B-

Swill - This was lovely, young, and fruit-filled. Midbodied, elegant, one o f my WOTNs. 1970 Canon A-

Flight 4 JL1 Muddy, pruney, my least favorite of wines I tasted.1870 Marques de Risc al Rioja Reserva C+

JL2 Whoa, tasty. Ripe full and young, I think Chris got vintage quickly. Cl assic fullbodied mature Nebbiolo. Another contender for WOTN for me. 1964 B arale Barolo A-

BK - good blackcurrant fruit, leather, a bit stolid, but nice example of of 60 year old Bordeaux! 1953 Talbot B+/A-

(somewhere in here there was a ‘66 CVNE Imperial opened, but I took other s’ word it was cooked)

Flight 5 (by this point I neglected to note who guessed correctly) RC2 This was a real surprise- best LB ‘64 I’ve had. Red fruits, tobacco , slim and elegant. 1964 Leoville-Poyferre B+

CK Herbs and cedar, good fruit, long. Tied for my WOTN. 1970 Cheval Blanc A

-

DW2 - this was replacement for the corked Beychevelle, just grabbed off rac k and carried on train, so a bit disturbed. Brawny, dark fruit, still some tannin, maybe just a hint of brown sugar but I didn’t find maderized like Brad 1966 Calon-Segur B+

Non-blind dessert wine- 1971 Baumard Quarts de Chaumes. Modest sweetness, b right tropical (pineapple) and citrus fruits, burnt sugar, honeysuckle. A-

Really sucessful night overall, I quite liked all but 3 wines. We voted for fave - I split my votes evenly (Cheval, Canon, and Vietti), but liked the Barale about as much. For group red wine of the night voting was a tie for first Vietti 10 pts Cheval Blanc 10 Barale 10 Ducru 7 Canon 3 Poyferre 2 Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a pa rty where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivi ty, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Reply to
DaleW
Loading thread data ...

oops, typo, Riscal is 1970!

Reply to
DaleW

I would have liked it to have been 1870. A 140+ year old wine. Now that would be interesting.

Reply to
lleichtman

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.