I think it would require more than one opinion. you could be biased. They aught to send me one too.. that way we have TWO opinions... :)
email: dallyn_spam at yahoo dot com please respond in this NG so others can share your wisdom as well!
Assuming it really is a 531-year old barrel of wine, and assuming it really has been treated as reported, I doubt you will need more than a small taste.
I once was "priviliged" to share a bottle of (pre-statehood) California "wine" with someone who bought it at auction and then was foolish enough to open it, rather than selling it to a bigger fool in
10 years time. It was a memorable experience, not one I wish to repeat.However, I suspect the whole 531-old barrel thing is a hoax, done for publicity, and whatever profit can be gained.
I think I have figured it out. The wine is basically vinegar BUT according to French laws as long as there is alcohol it can be considered wine with a high VA. That explains the quote in the article about being "very acidic to the taste". It's alcoholic vinegar.
Bob
DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.