Score

Nov 26, 2004 1 Replies

I've tried to add scores to my own tasting notes the last year, and the scoresystem used in highschool (or the norwegian equvivalent to highschool) was the one I was most familiar with: bottom score = 1, top = 6. (Using plusses and minuses etc, it's allready rather a finegraded system. (E.g. 3-, 3, 3+, 3 to 4, 4-, ...)



Now, since the system most used on whisky is the one for instance Michael Jackson is using, I have just "translated" my own into that. This wasn't a problem, and now I can more easily compare my scores with others.



But a peculiar system it is, going from 50 to 100, where 50 is bottom score. What's the background for this? Or is it something below 50? Shall we imagine blends in the 40s and 30s, and moonshine in the 10s?



(I know it's a system adopted from scoring wines, but I understand there are different opinions on scoresystems among winewriters too, and that the 50-100 system is not universaly used. For instance, the magazine Decanter uses a system with from one to six stars instead).



Gunnar


I co-ordinate the national beer scoring scheme in the UK which uses a 6 point (0-5) scale. What is interesting is that the scale is non-linear, 2 to 4 for example are all perfectly ok beer. The other fact is that the descriptiptions that go with each score are written in a meaningful way, for example:

2 Average Competently kept, drinkable pint but doesn't inspire in any way, not worth moving to another pub but you drink the beer without really noticing.

This is not just an academic exercise, the scores are used to help select pubs for the CAMRA Good Beer Guide.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required