Whisky Galore!

A new batch of whiskies has just arrived at my local store.

These are the Whisky Galore bottlings. Several were on the local shelves, including a Glen Garioch which I will have to try eventually, and I was told that more were on their way.

They are uncoloured, unchill-filtered, and bottled at 46% ABV.

The great thing about uncoloured whiskies is that you can make a reasonable expectation about the nature of the cask they were aged in. The labels don't say whether the cask was plain wood, bourbon, or sherry (etc.), but there was a very dark Aultmore that must have come from sherry given the moderate age. Most were from plain wood or bourbon wood.

I reached for an Ardmore, because that distillery's products have not been very available locally, with only an old Glenhaven bottling and a Cadenhead having been sighted before.

Ardmore, 15yo, distilled 1988 and bottled 2003, @ 46% ABV.

My first impression is that this whisky resembles what I expect from Clynelish.

A yeasty, peaty nose; sweet on the early palate and becoming very spicy; with a short clean finish. A little "ozone" makes it seem like an Island malt. It lacks the "mustard" quality that some Clynelish bottlings have, though. Maybe from a second fill bourbon, maybe from plain wood.

It's a little hot - it's one of the few 46% ABV whiskies that seems to need a drop of water to tame the fires. Haven't tried it that way yet, though.

Are there any whiskies in the Whisky Galore series that are especially worth looking out for? There was a Bowmore on the shelf which looked appealing.

And the one bottle of the UCF Sig. Caol Ila was gone, of course!

Bart

Reply to
Bart
Loading thread data ...

This explains why the type of cask isn't mentioned on the label.

They reminded me of the Murray McDavid bottlings, being bottled at

46% ABV, uncoloured and unchill-filtered.

I believe 50% or less of what I'm told at the shops, but I was told that beside the several now on the shelf more were expected around Christmas. If so they're just my style. For the last year or so most of the new or interesting whiskies that have shown up locally have been very old, rare, and expensive. Surely good, but still... A batch of new whiskies priced near the price of premium singles will keep me interested for a long time. Hope it's not a fluke. But with no explanation occasionally whiskies have appeared on local shelves that didn't belong there. A single bottle of OB Ardbeg '75 was packed in a case of '78s and I didn't realize it was something special until someone had beaten me to it.

I must like this: I'm going through it fast enough. Partly because it really is a good whisky, and partly because I've been bouncing between peat monsters and over sherried sirens for a while. Something that isn't one dimensional peat or dominated by wood is just what I've been wanting lately.

This Ardmore is on the peaty side, in the palate more than the finish. Not so much that it is like an Islay whisky, but after repeated dramming still reminds me of Clynelish. Well, the Clynelish I've come to know from a few independent bottlings. How is it different? Well, there's something "lemony" in the nose but not citric - more like the smell of lemon drop candy. It's a bit spirity, "hot" on the back of the tongue. But there is a very pleasant sweetness under the burn. A drop of water tames this but it's more interesting undiluted, heat and all.

Thanks for the info. I don't remember the specs on the Bowmore I saw.

I have seen the old movie "Whisky Galore". I thought it was just a story, but apparently was based on a real incident. Salvaged whisky from the 'Politician' has recently been marketed as "Atlatic Gold".

Bart

Reply to
Bart

I love my Signatory UCF 10 (1992/2003) Ardmore. It's certainly as peaty as my Bowmore 12. And the UCF is clean, bright, and punchy to boot. Very distinctive. The peat flavor is very unique (I think I posted a while back that it is like the smell of the Berlin subway that I loved in my youth!).

Reply to
Douglas W. Hoyt

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.