For our tasting last Saturday, I brought this wine. The group agreed on
"medium ruby color with orange rim. Nose of coffee and rum pot. Extremely acidic - lemon, grapefruit. Mouth drying tannin, but virtually no fruit."
Have a look at R.Parker's review from April 94, WA#92: 94-97 points: " massive, with huge extraction of fruit; fabulously fragrant nose of cedar, jammy black-cherries, herbs, and roses; extremely concentrated, well-integrated monumental Barolo. The super level of ripeness makes this wine very accessible, even seductive when young."
My opinion of this wine didn't change proven by a TN of the firat bottle from november 96: "light ruby color; austere alcoholic nose with kirsch liqueur. The wine is dominated by the adstingent tannin which makes it virtually undrinkable, the fruit doesn't get through. No idea what RP is talking about: massive, monumental, seductive, ... ridiculous!
It is quite obvious that the wine RP drank and the six bottles I bought are completely different things. What I want to know: Did they give Parker a special "tasting nectar" or was I just unlucky with my sixpack I bought on a cold All-Saints-Day 1994 at the winery in Barolo?
Can anybody shed some light on this issue? Or easier: How did you experience this wine?
Martin