An open letter to E. Carl Speros

Greetings from Auckland, New Zealand.

I have taken the very unusual action (for me) of writing directly to a fellow contributor to alt.food.wine.

I have contributed to this newsgroup since 1997 and have seen many people come and go - there are also quite a few "originals" who have been around a lot longer than I.

I would respectfully like to make a couple of points.

alt.food.wine is a very active group, set up for the friendly discussion re matters of wine appreciation, and as has been often noted, it is international in both it's scope and contributorship.

Whereas, obviously the majority of contributors hail from the US, significant numbers come from Britain, France, Austria, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Spain, Australia, New Zealand and many other places.

Of course, for many contributors, English is not a first language - therefore there exists, by necessity, an element of tolerance.

On the other hand, this means that no matter which geographic area may be under discussion, there will be someone with encyclopedic knowledge of the wines of that area.

Further, in alt.food.wine there is a wealth of international tasting experience - some of it from people involved in the hospitality industry in various capacities (chefs, wine buyers, journalists, sommeliers; retail and trade representatives etc) - as well as many extremely knowledgeable non-professionals.

I count myself somewhat in both groups; I was (in a previous life) the marketing manager for a small winery in New Zealand (I am conversant with many of the intricacies of international wine marketing having spent many years in both Australia and the UK - but have travelled extensively pursuing my personal passion for all things vinous (whilst I live in New Zealand, but have visited Australia, South Africa, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, South America as well as the US over a period of 25 years).

So, I know a little a about wine - but compared with some of the others within a.f.w. (some of whom I have hosted as they travelled downunder and toured NZ vineyards with me) - I am constantly in awe of the vast reservoir of experience and knowledge others have accumulated and chose to share.

Usenet is an amazing phenomenon - but remember Carl, virtually everything is archived - it is nigh on impossible to escape ones musings once "published"

Thus, before I started this correspondence, I took liberty of checking out your posting history by doing an Advanced Search for E. Carl Speros - and this is what I came up with.

You are around 70 years old; live in Lancaster County, Pa., you consider yourself an atheist; you made your first posting on Usenet (via webtv) on 31 December 2001 - and for the first twelve months of so, restricted your postings to the subject of the US civil war on the (moderated group) soc.history.war.us-civil-war.

You have further interests in bass fishing and boxing (remember, I am in Auckland, New Zealand - and have ascertained this in a few minutes of "research")

In fact, on the 11 July this year, on soc.history.war.us-civil-war you posted thus "Bravo, Mike Anyone with an agenda or here for purposes of proselytizing shouldn't be made welcome on a friendly discussion NG"

Carl, I compare this statement with some of those you have made onto a ng, about which I am passionate.

You regularly write of "wine snobs" - you may know some people you describe thus, but your barbs are nonetheless insulting.

You have made some simply erroneous statements, which when respectfully corrected by a knowledgeable national (do you recall writing about Muscadet from the Rhone Valley?) you arrogantly retorted a single word "Wrong!"

In of your very first postings to a.f.w. on 31 Mar 03, you expounded that "healthful esters & aldehydes (chemical compounds) help lower LDL" yet when an esteemed contributor (a Chemistry Professor from Purdue University no less) respectfully asked you to elucidate, you simply ignored him.

If you are going to publish contentious statements, have the fortitude to defend your position, or retreat gracefully.

More recently, you took issue with a longtime contributor, saying "I could buy & sell you in wine kowledge" (your spelling mistake, not mine!) - and this to a man with a 3,000+ bottle wine cellar, and who has posted over

1,000 detailed tasting notes on some of the world greatest wines in this forum in the past seven years.

Bill Spohn lives in Vancouver, Canada, geographically, a lot to the State of Washington than Pennsylvania. is !!! - I have never met the man, but, his contribution to my wine education has been immense - his is an opinion to be respected.

If you are going to disagree with a statement or opinion of any ontributor - which certainly is your right, then argue the issue; demonstrate your knowledge and experience with specifics, rather than vilification.

There is one MAJOR issue which is getting up many peoples noses - and that is the Signature which your affix to your postings.

Convention has it that in the alt. hierarchy, signature lines should be limited to three or four lines.

The charter of s.h.w. us-civil-war asks that signatures be restricted to six lines.

Like many others, I pay for my internet usage, not by time spent on the net, but by the volume downloaded.

Your insistence on affixing a signature line half the size of "War and Peace" costs me (and many others) money - and all for something which may have some relevance to those with an interest in the Civil War, but no relevance whatsoever to a wine enthusiast in Mbabane, Swaziland, Wooloomooloo, Australia or any other place in the wine drinking world.

Whereas, alt.food.wine is not moderated, there are published standards, which appear at

formatting link

May I respectfully suggest you take a quick perusal, at your convenience.

In conclusion, Carl, I like 99% of others who regularly tune into a.f.w. do so simply for education and enjoyment, and to enjoy sharing our knowledge and passion with like minded people from around the globe.

You have a choice Carl.

You can take part in a knowledgeable and friendly manner, respectful of those with greater knowledge than you, or you can arrogantly continue on the know-it-all manner you have demonstrated to date.

I truly hope you chose the former path - elsewise I, (and many others) will simply killfile and/or ignore you.

I do not much believe in "constructive criticism" - really, it is just criticism, isn't it?

Which is why criticism (and particularly from a total stranger) it is always hard to accept.

However, by posting within the open forum which is usenet, you open yourself to criticism.

I do hope that you accept this in the respectful way it is intended.

Seasons Greetings,

Alexander Andrew St.Helier-Bourke a.k.a. Lord St.Helier Auckland, New Zealand.

"It is often better to remain silent, and have people think that you may be a fool; Than to speak up - and remove all doubt."

Reply to
st.helier
Loading thread data ...

Very well-said, thank you.

M.

Reply to
Michael Pronay

Wow, I am beyond shock. This is the 2nd amazing post I've read in the NewsGroups this month. Just when I had begun to lose faith that they were only spammed by idiots.

Alexander, I share the same thoughts and feelings with you about many posters on the various NG. I am sure there are many others who will soon echo the same sentiments. This is a place to share ideas and knowledge, but too many express their utter ignorance by pretending to be something that they are not. Many are simply naive and only wish to attack those with a different viewpoint, not realizing that they are missing an opportunity to gain new knowledge or experience something new.

Happy holidays to you and your family my friend!

Dale

Reply to
R. Dale Leonard

Wow!...... Bravo.

Reply to
Chuck Reid

snip Agree with our NZ contributor. However, there is always this downside to an unmoderated ng. I wondered at the time whether E Carl Speros was a troll and I am keeping an open mind on it.

A superb UK newsgroup, uk.rec.birdwatching, has been virtually destroyed by people feeding trolls, and malicious cross postings from animal rights activists. Some of our contributors were well known ornithologists, and the venom that was piled on these authorities was upsetting to all of us.

Kill files work, but the way that these newsgroup assassins can now have multiple and ever-changing ISP's is overwhelming my killfiles.

Just my 2p

JT

Reply to
John Taverner

respectful

date.

Bravo! Well said (the entire message, not just the paragraph I quoted).

Reply to
Ken Blake

Hi Alexander Andrew St.Helier-Bourke a.k.a. Lord St.Helier I would agree in principle with your statements. I must admit I don't read every post in AFW - some just don't apply to me (although I wish they did) - so I probably missed some posts.

I hope Mr. E. Carl will stay with us and adopt a more subdued attitude. Everyone has something to contribute ... regardless.

Just my $.02 Dick in the USA

BTW: Any opinion on Mount Riley Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc 2002

- Product of New Zealand?

Reply to
Dick R.

Does your counting method go "One", "couple" ? (Grin!!)

Seriously. Well said. I agree with everything you wrote.

Don't hold your breath, Andrew.

Put simply - "behave like a civilised human being or be killfiled". I'm afraid I've got a shorter fuse than most and simply dismissed him as one of Usenet's trolls and killfiled him several days ago. Life's too short.

All the best Ian (To reply by email PLEASE don't use "Reply to" but use my name at wanadoo.fr) Thanks.

Reply to
Anthony Hoare

Ian Hoare, masquerading as his sibling, wrote........

Ian, as you well know, I am a simple beast!

Don't you remember my driving?

In town = foot half way on the gas! Out of town = foot all the way down!

Similarly, in the same vein

One =1 Couple = more

Considering Civil War Carl's passion, I thought that the above statement was nothing short of brilliant - but it seems to have been fired over every one else's head !!!!

Oh well, back to the Christmas cheer!

(Can you rub some more suntan lotion on please hon. - and refill my glass while you're up!!!)

-- st.helier the sunburnt.

Reply to
st.helier

Mount Riley is another Marlborough vineyard whose star is on the rise.

The '02 Sauvignon is one of the better examples in a good vintage (sold out here nearly a year ago!) in that typical zingy, gooseberry - ripe red capsicum style.

2003 was a year where the quality was OK - but volumes are 30-50% down owing to spring frosts; so if you can still find the '02 - go for it.

Although wine competitions leave me decidedly underwhelmed, I see from perusing their web site

formatting link
I see they picked up a gold medal in San Francisco - which *may* make them a target from buyers who use competitions as a buying guide.

Let me put it this way - Xmas downunder is bar-b-que / salad type of fare - I would welcome a suitably chilled bottle on my luncheon table.

-- St.Helier

Reply to
st.helier

"st.helier" wrote in news:7B5Gb.38617$ snipped-for-privacy@news.xtra.co.nz:

I have a bottle of 01 sitting in front of me. come on over (N. Florida) I will share. Please don't tell me I am too late ;-)

Reply to
jcoulter

A bit late for me - tis Xmas eve (4:15pm) here and I have already popped a bottle of bubbles!!!

Xmas greetings to all

Reply to
st.helier

Heh. I'm just about to pop the cork on a Clos du Val Lodi Zin to accompany take-home pizza. Perhaps I'll pop the cork on delightful '00 Marlborough Vineyard Pinot Noir tomorrow evening...

Best tidings to all! Dana

Reply to
Dana Myers

Do you mean *Martinborough* Vineyards, Dana?

If so, it is one on NZs better PNs.

Reply to
st.helier

Um, yes indeed. Must have been a confused moment. Martinborough Vineyards PN. Sorry about that.

Heavens yes, it's delicious stuff. I like the

*Martinborough* Vineyards Sauvignon Blanc quite a bit, too.

Cheers! Dana

Reply to
Dana Myers

"Dana Myers" corrected himself by writing........

Yes, Sauvignon from Martinborough has most of the characteristics of Marlborough, with the addition of a few more tropical nuances (guava, pineapple etc)

If you can locate some, try a Sauvignon from Palliser Estate - also from Martinborough.

Smart stuff.

Don't overindulge over the festive season????

No - retract that statement - Damn the torpedoes - enjoy! enjoy! enjoy!

Reply to
st.helier

Sounds like a good plan to me, but I'll have to wait 4 months or so until the snow melts.

Thanks for the reply and Happy Holidays to you. Dick in Minnesota, USA

Reply to
Dick R.

Thanks for the invite but we're all caught up in the holiday season - shoppers rushing home with their treasures, etc. In January when the harsh reality of winter sets in, I'll wish I was down there in Florida, but I suppose the bottle will be gone by then. :-(

Have a nice holiday season, Dick in Minnesota, USA

Reply to
Dick R.

Excellent - thanks for the suggestion.

Um, are you taking a survey?

Ah! That's more like it. The same to you!

Dana

Reply to
Dana Myers

I did stock the Mt Riley for a while, conveniently distributed by Angove's in Australia. With this rap, best I put it back on the shelves. It was excellent QPR for a NZ SB, and even we Aussies concede the greatness of the NZ SB's.

PS... Andrew, I still have a few bottles of the 02 Palliser stashed away. Life span of this treat sir??

Regards Swooper

Reply to
swoope

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.