: Generally Rasteau produces big, deep, hot, generous wines with lots of : jammy fruit as appreciated by RP. (Interesting aside: just ran across : a copy of RP's '87 guide to the Rhone while browsing through boxes. : In Rasteau he mentions _only_ the coop as being of "excellent quality!" : It is a good coop, but far from the best in the village, even back then.) : They are best appreciated young or after 10 or more years. They do, : as Dale suggests, tend to shut down somewhat, but not as much as : a Chateauneuf IMHO.
Emery (and Dale), this could be and I'm going to let that last bottle sit for awhile longer. There was just such a difference between 2 years that I was afraid that, like many an RP-loved wine, the alcohol would dominate a thin frame of a wine. I bought this on closeout for $19, so I don't feel Too bad.
But they are worth holding; as the tannins resolve : they turn into some of the very best from the southern Rhone. Not light : praise that!
: La Soumade is certainly a star of the appellation, and typically very ageworthy. : That said, vintages differ, and I didn't taste any of the '99, so it may just : be that this _particular_ confiance won't age well. Time will tell, : please report back in 2010! :) Anyway it is inaccurate to say that : Rasteau doesn't age "gracefully."
Will do, but probably more like 3-4 years. I'd tasted 'dumb' CDP's before. They were closed, but you could tell there was stuffing there. This Soumade I worried about since I couldn't detect fruit or tannin (but this could be the grenache component, since I rarely find grenache to be tannic in the same way other reds can be).
: BTW, I see you are posting from a Sun 4! What a dinosaur, that's the : VME card cage thing, probably about 10 MHz, right? I think I used : one of these long, long ago... SunOS 5.8 seems to remind me of a : _text only_ embedded unix.
You know, I'm not sure, since that's the server that the university runs UNIX on, and I *know* they are not upgrading or putting resources into this, so, yes, it Could be that old!
Thanks for the responses!
Mark S (and Emery, you need to 'delurk' some more! Miss your excellent posting)