- posted
18 years ago
Having had Freemark's Bosche from 72,73,74, and 76, I was surprised by the intensity of the 78. The other mentioned vintages were fairly full by today's standards, but in the middle range for the 70's. The 74 was still holding fairly well recently. Of course the 78 is not nearly as massive as some of the big Cabernets of the 70's era. I need only mention some of the monster Cabernets that David Bruce made back then.
I still have a bottle or two of Freemark's Edelwein(LH riesling) 73 which may have been their first Edelwein vintage. Perhaps you can correct me if my memory is faulty. It is of about BA richness and still is holding fairly well, although it has seen better days. I also have their premiun Edelwein Gold 76 which is of about TBA richness - outstanding and still holding well. The Edelwein 78 is still decent, but not as good as the 76. I also have a few half bottles of Edelwein Gold 91, but I have not yet tasted it.It has 21% residual sugar. I have had some of Freemark's Petite Sirah from the 70s. The best I remember, they had plenty of body, but not nearly as much as some of the monsters from that era. I still have a bottle of the 79.
I also have some half bottles of late harvest rieslings from St. Jean, Phelps, Raymond, and Veedercrest. A 78 selected late harvest from Phelps is quite a sticky with 30% residual sugar, but it has enough acid and body to handle that, and it still is drinking very well. These wines did not sell well in my area despite the fact that they cost considerably less than BAs and TBAs from the better German estates(then rather inexpensive by today's standards). After tasting a few I bought out what a few local stores had received. People just did not seem to know what to do with such sweet and rich wines, despite their quality.
DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.