TN: Dull Salice Salentino

My turn to make dinner last night, but I was too tired to go back ojut to the store. A rummage through the fridge led to a pasta with a ricotta, spinach, parmesan and bacon sauce. Betsy threw together a green salad with mango and peppers. I opened a bottle of 1999 Cantele Salice Salentino Riserva. Label says it's 85% Negroamaro grapes and 15% Malvasia. Rather ripe dark fruit, decent acidity, some slightly drying tannins. Some light pleasant aromas of vanilla oak and roadtar. Not a bad wine for the price, and I've touted it in past vintages as a QPR favorite. But this doesn't excite me. Part of the problem is probably the match - an unoaked white would have been a better match. Yet a sip well after dinner still left me unexcited, and more than half the bottle remained. B-

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.

Reply to
DaleW
Loading thread data ...

"DaleW" skrev i melding news: snipped-for-privacy@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Slightly corked? Anders

Reply to
Anders Tørneskog

Taurino's Salice Salentino product is very consistent, but I like the Notarpnaro much better.

Cantele? Who knows? Not all producers are t> My turn to make dinner last night, but I was too tired to go back ojut

Reply to
uraniumcommittee

Anders, When someone uses "dull" that's often my first reaction (a TCA taint below perception threshold), but I don't think this is the case here. I just retasted this tonight, and what I think:

1) this is a good wine for it's $8 pricetag, but was too heavy/ponderous for the meal. 2) more importantly, I was tired yesterday. '82 Mouton ( a wine I love) would have probably gotten a A- ("really nice, but not thrilling"). While my disclaimer notes that I make no claims of consistency, most of us view tasting notes (from anyone, professional or amateur) as real snaphots of wines at a particular moment. When in fact they are snapshots of wines at a particular moment as seen through a flawed lens (in this case, me). I've noted before that maybe one should take exuberant reviews of wines I had on a special night with Betsy (or first night I saw her after she got back from a tour) with a grain of salt, but how is the reader to know everytime I've had a bad day? No biggie with me, but one can extrapolate to other reviewers. Taste IS subjective.
Reply to
DaleW

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.