Friday Betsy was working, I was tired, and ....to my shame ...bought a takeout/warmup meal. Got a pasta (ziti?) bolognese and a couple jalapeno poppers at a local branch of an Arthur Avenue deli. Opened a
1994 Fonterutoli Chianti Classico. Not a strong vintage, but I always like the 3 Fs. Or do I? At first taste this seems thin and dilute. I come very close to dumping. But over the next 3-4 hours one of the more amazing revivals/transformations I've ever experienced occurs. Over time, some distinct black cherry and plum notes emerge. Some mineral and a little tobacco. This isn't a earthmoving Chianti, and could use a bit more acidic edge. But WAY better than first taste. An argument for producer over vintage. BSaturday I made some slow-cooked Alaskan king salmon, with some anchovy-cooked mushrooms and broccoli. I opened a 2003 St. Innocent "Villages" Pinot Noir (Willamette Valley). Apparently a young-vines combo from several vineyards. Medium-bodied, sweet cherry and raspberry fruit. Not a lot of secondary characteristics or nuance, but a good varietally correct wine. Decent QPR at $20. B/B+
Over a couple nights also tried a 2003 Domaine de la Pepiere (Marc Olivier) Muscadet Sevre et Maine Sur Lie. Riper and easier than previous vintages, but fun and tasty. Very minerally (more than I remember from previous tastes).B/B+
Saturday afternoon Im was in Tarrytown, stopped in a local store. A distributor's rep was there, pouring a few wines. I tried two:
2001 La Buxynoise Montagny "Chagnots" 1er Cru Bright apple fruit, a hint of oak, ultimately short and simple. B-1999 Chevalier du Gruaud-Larose Some Bordeaux-earth on nose, modest cassis fruit. Quite short on finish. B-
Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency