TN:Move along, nothing to see here folks

Jul 20, 2005 2 Replies

After being impressed with a Cazin Cour Cheverny at a dinner, I picked up a bottle of the 2004 Cazin "Le Petit Chambord" Cheverny. Very different - quite grassy with some light (just this side of dilute) gooseberry/lime fruit. OK on a hot Monday, but my mistake in matching with a shrimp/chinese sausage/baby bok choy stirfry. I went to a voice recital and premiere of a friend's new piece, returned and enjoyed a glass by itself more than with dinner. Still, there are other light wines I like better so this will not be a buy again for me. B-



Some friends invited me over to dinner last night. Knowing they're strictly red drinkers, I carried along the 2001 La Fleur du Jaugue (St. Emilion). Medium-bodied Merlot, rather soft with some light cedar/oak notes and a hint of herbs and spice. B



They opened a 2000 Louis Bernard Côtes du Rhône Villages. At first this seemed light and perhaps fading, but some air did it some good and it turned into a credible if unexciting CdR. Modest red fruit, some Provencal herbs, not a lot on finish. A better match with the dinner (a pasta with herbs and peppers) than the Bordeaux. B/B-



Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency.



Dale, have you ever had anything truly interesting from Louis Bernard? The few of his wines that I've had have left me singularly unimpressed.

Mark Lipton

Mark, Truly interesting? Nah. Usually competent, never exciting. That's based on a few CdRs, CdRVs, and CdPs.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required