Does anyone *know* about whether Guinness really do blend pasteurised Brettanomyces-infected beer into any of their stouts. Googling hits repeated replications of a quote from Martin Lodahl that suggests they do, but there is very little corroboration.
You know who would know? The folks that brew it. All you have to do is find somebody who lives in Ireland and have him or her knock up the brewers and ask.
There's geography and there's networks, so it's not as near as that in social space. And they seem a secretive bunch, those Guinness technologist-brewers (just ask Gossett). No brewery tours, just a Guinness-image museum.
You mean like, I'm not going to stay with you and you're going to have to raise the baby alone if you don't tell me the secret of Guinness and Brettanomyces?
... and I can certainly say that it has a background tartness that makes for excellent balance (unlike, say, beers I've brewed at this sort of ABV which verged on cloying). I can't say that I detect anything specifically equine, but it is about 12 hours past the ideal tasting time. (Note to self: save other bottle for Saturday elevenses.)
snipped-for-privacy@see.headers (Joel) wrote in news:dvcll1$768$ snipped-for-privacy@badger.ncsa.uiuc.edu:
How many years was that?
Huh?
I suppose Guinness used (or more likely, had to live with) Brett (hence that whole blending thing in the bad old days)...but as Superkid would say: "I don't get you." Have you (all) noticed an intensifaction of horse in Guinness?
Are you implying that they use it and it gets knocked off at the desired level during pateurization? Are you implying that I can find super-horsey old kegs of Guinness somewhere? If the latter, PLEASE let me know where - that's worth airfare. If the former, I think you're full of horseshit. I don't "get" horse in Guinness of any label/package that is available to me.
As an aside, I have used Brett and my limited experience is that it does not go logarithmic over time. It's contribution is relatively short but stable in the long term.
No, my point is simple. Brett doesn't need oxygen, and can eat just about anything. If the olf Guinness had Brett, and wasn't pasteurized, the Brett would continue to work, and old Giunes [sic] would've been a vary variable beast, getting more horsey as it aged. Since I (and from lack of reportage, nobody else either) never encountered that, there was ipso facto no Brett in Guinness.
That's not been my experience. But I will have to tap the keg of plambic that's been sitting in my basement for about six years to see what has happened to it.
To get back to your earlier points, other sources imply that the soured beer blended in has always been pasteurised, so increasing horsiness wouldn't have been a problem. And also, just in case of misunderstanding, the answer applies to Foreign Export Stout, not the substantially weaker Extra Stout.
DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.