1. Home
  2. General Wine Forum
  3. 1997 Beringer Private Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon

1997 Beringer Private Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon

Last night with grilled venison chops and oven roasted beets and yams. I haven't opened a '97 Beringer PR for a number of years. I opened and decanted (there was a fair amount of sediment) and started drinking upon decanting. The wine was still deep inky almost black with just a hint of clearing at the rim. The nose was pouring from the bottle while I was decanting. Great depth in the nose of crushed currants, creme de cassis and smoke. In the glass the nose continued to evolve showing black fruits, vanilla, anise, and that distinctive Napa dust aroma. Still fairly hefty in the glass with substanitial forward concentrated black fruit, berries, plums and cassis. Smooth as silk and well framed by plush yet firm tannic structure. As with most '97's fairly low acid but the wine wasn't cloying nor did it overpower the food. So far I've been impressed by most all of the '97 Napa Cabs that I've opened recently and the concerns about them falling apart hasn't happened as far as I can tell. Certainly an "A" on the Dale Scale.

Reply to
Bi!!
Loading thread data ...

'97 was an extremely good year for cabs in Napa and Sonoma (and other full bodied reds in Northern California too). Alas, all mine are drunk up.

Jose

Reply to
Jose

I'm still sitting on a couple '97 Gallo of Sonoma's (standard bottling). The biggest over-achieving wine of all time. I did have one 6 months ago and it was showing VERY WELL. I think it has at least another 10 years of life left in it.

Sean

.
Reply to
Sean E. Slindee

I've had this one, almost since its release, both decanted and poured-n- swirlled, and have declared it quite good. I've been tapping into my '97s, and have found few, if any, "falling apart." Thanks for the TN's. I'll get analytical with a few of my last bottles of this, and do a comparison set of notes.

Ninety-seven might not have matched '94, or '85, but was still, IMHO, a very, very good CA vintage, especially for Napa.

Hunt

Reply to
Hunt

'85 is an interesting vintage, as I think that many of the wines didn't develop the way that had been envisioned at release. To wit, many of the wines dried out prematurely. OTOH, '87 was IMO the best of the decade for both Cabernets and Zinfandels. And, to me, '94 -- as good as it is -- has been overshadowed by '91... but my judgment might be clouded by the insane price increases that took place in the interim. I agree that '97 looks to be a good year, perhaps a great year, but alas I bought very little from that year because I'd been priced out of the market. FWIW, I bought quite a bit more from '98 and have been *very* favorably impressed (so far) with how they've developed.

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.