buying a 40 y/o bottle of wine

My wife really loves wine, and her 40th birthday is just around the corner. I was thinking of finding her a 40 y/o bottle of (red) wine for her birthday because I think she'd really get a kick out of it. My problem is that I don't know much about wine. I've been searching around on wine-searcher.com and other sites for cabernet savignons, because it's my understanding that they age the best. There are many

40 year old bottles available, but some of them are quite expensive. Is it safe to assume that if I buy the wine from a reputable cellar, and they don't list any defects, that it should be drinkable? I just don't want to shell out $100 or more for a bottle of vinegar.
Reply to
Rob
Loading thread data ...

Once you get to 40 years the only wine you could probably be absolutely certain is in top shape (excepting of course the possibility of cork taint) is Madeira.A Colheita port is probably next safest.

For dry wines, '66 was a pretty good year in Medoc (left bank of Bordeaux), and many are drinking nicely- Montrose, LLC, etc. We recently had a '66 Ducru for a friend's 40th, nice wine. It ws $90 at Premiercru.net, I see they have it at $120 now. But there is always risk with older wines, especially dry ones.

Good luck. If you do f> My wife really loves wine, and her 40th birthday is just around the

Reply to
DaleW

Once you get to 40 years the only wine you could probably be absolutely certain is in top shape (excepting of course the possibility of cork taint) is Madeira.A Colheita port is probably next safest.

For dry wines, '66 was a pretty good year in Medoc (left bank of Bordeaux), and many are drinking nicely- Montrose, LLC, etc. We recently had a '66 Ducru for a friend's 40th, nice wine. It ws $90 at Premiercru.net, I see they have it at $120 now. But there is always risk with older wines, especially dry ones.

Good luck. If you do f> My wife really loves wine, and her 40th birthday is just around the

Reply to
DaleW

You could definitely go with a grand vin de bordeaux / bordeaux superieur. A St Emilion Grand Cru seems appropriate, Chateau Pavie has excellent bottles in the 60-70 decade. Here are some articles about chateau Pavie and St-emilion:

formatting link

Buy chateau Pavie1966 Here:

formatting link

And in a more generalistic way, some very basic information about knowing wine that are aging well:

formatting link

Nguma Monene

formatting link

Reply to
Nguma Monene

Reply to
DaleW
Reply to
Timothy Hartley
Reply to
Steve Slatcher

Pointless. Just get a nice bottle of wine. Most wines are going to be well past their peak at age 40, and those that don't are going to be quite expensive. The wine novice thends to equate ageability with quality. This is far from the case. A port might be a good possibility.

Reply to
UC

The '66 Krohn was one of the bottles we were eying for friend's birthday before we went with a Ducru to drink with him and a LLC for him to have as a present. Glad to hear it's good. If Port is a possibility the OP might consider that (assuming he is in US) the Krohn- Premier Cru has for I think $80. They also have one bottle of the 1966 Ducru for $125 - I paid $90, but my bottle was VHS (tasted fine), this one is listed as "perfect condition."

Reply to
DaleW

How do you ever get a woman to admit that it is her 40th birthday? Mine has been "29" for as long as I can remember. ;-)

Godzilla

Reply to
Godzilla

Oops. Yes, search for "Krohn" (or "Wiese & Krohn") if you want to find the wine. In my case I just wanted a good wine rather than looking for something special for an anniversary, and understood that

1966 was an excellent vintage.
Reply to
Steve Slatcher

a far better idea is to buy a $40 bottle!

Or better still, a case of $40 wine of a type that will age well and drink a bottle on every Birthday!

pk

Reply to
p.k.

Thanks for the advice everyone. I noted that several people recommended port, unfortunately that is the one wine she really doesn't like. Her favorite is pinot noir, but I understand that doesn't age very well so I haven't even looked for that.

I noted a couple people basically said "don't bother." I expected more of these, actually, since I know how much neophytes looking for old wine annoy the connoisseurs. Despite that advice, I'll probably continue looking for a good 40 y/o bottle of wine. It's the age that's important for the birthday in this case. Neither my wife or I are experts at wine tasting. A glass many of you might spit out might cause both of us to think, "Eh, your average bottle of red wine." As long as it hasn't turned completely undrinkable, she'll appreciate the thought the most.

Reply to
Rob

I'll be glad to make up the deficit between your expectations and the results here by again reminding you that very few wines will be actually drinkable at that age. It is a myth that most wine can age a very long time. Very few wines actually have that kind of longevity.

Reply to
UC

Rob wrote in news:07hfk2lprqcsssv8e9rtmtjf8v2sb405jm@

4ax.com:

I think you misread the advice, the forget it is more "it won't be worth the cost, read most of us wouldn't go to the hassle as younger wine is available that is more dependable in terms of its readiness to drink.

There are several folks here who do appreciate older wines but by and large most are looking for good value and great quality (the elusive quest!) You biggest problem is that it is hard to be sure that you are getting good value. Go for it just keep your expectations in check. It is better to be wowed than underwhelmed!

Reply to
Joseph Coulter

So he's asking for one that does. They are a small percentage of wines produced, but there are enough to keep us busy. Cool it UC...

Reply to
Mike Tommasi

Too bad about the Port, just because that is the safest (except Madeira, even more an oddball taste for many people).

Pinot Noir can age well (at least in Burgundy, an ok mid-70s PN was my oldest New World). But usually only the top wines, and then you're really getting into big bucks. I don't think '66 is considered a great year in Burgundy (maybe Cwdjryx can chime in), although I did see very positive comments I believe on some recent Leroy library '66 releases. But we're probably talking $300-500.

I'd stick to Left Bank Bordeaux, personally. For $125-175 you can find Ducru, various Leovilles, etc. at various dependable outlets. I'd personally be a little wary of most Right Bank wines except noted agers like Ausone, Cheval Blanc, Soutard, Figeac. If you don't have winesearcher pro feel free to email me & I'll send you some options.

cheers!

Reply to
DaleW

There are a number of shops in the US that have older vintages which are usually well stored. A copy of Broadbent's tome on wines he's tasted would work if you found something. There are vintage dated Armignacs around & also sweet whites from the Loire.

Reply to
Joe "Beppe"Rosenberg

Rob wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

I understand that 1966 was a very good year for Burgandy. The trouble is that the wines that are still good are going to be *very* expensive.

Some Sauternes would still be very good, again *very* expensive.

The premium German wines could still be holding. Probably expensive.

From Italy, Gaja & Barolo could still be at or near their peak. Possibly the best bet price/quality wise.

I looked at winecommune, typed in 1966 as a search item, and Gaja and Barolo, and a Margeau, were the most reasonably priced, but the best wines?????

As others have warned, at that age it's a crapshoot.

Reply to
Jim Lovejoy

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.