McLibel case: the text McDonald's sued over

Feb 15, 2005 13 Replies

(The European Court of Human Rights held today that the UK Government was liable to Steel and Morris, defendants in the McLibel case, for refusing them legal aid.)



formatting link



formatting link
(full URL:
formatting link
dKingdom150205.htm )


"FIFTY ACRES EVERY MINUTE



EVERY year an area of rainforest the size of Britain is cut down or defoliated, and burnt. Globally, one billion people depend on water flowing from these forests, which soak up rain and release it gradually. The disaster in Ethiopia and Sudan is at least partly due to uncontrolled deforestation. In Amazonia - where there are now about 100,000 beef ranches



- torrential rains sweep down through the treeless valleys, eroding the land and washing away the soil. The bare earth, baked by the tropical sun, becomes useless for agriculture. It has been estimated that this destruction causes at least one species of animal, plant or insect to become extinct every few hours.



Why is it wrong for McDonald's to destroy rainforests?



AROUND the Equator there is a lush green belt of incredibly beautiful tropical forest, untouched by human development for one hundred million years, supporting about half of the Earth's life-forms, including some



30,000 plant species, and producing a major part of the planet's crucial supply of oxygen.

PET FOOD AND LITTER



McDonald's and Burger King are two of the many US corporations using lethal poisons to destroy vast areas of Central American rainforest to create grazing pastures for cattle to be sent back to the States as burgers and pet food, and to provide fast-food packaging materials. (Don't be fooled by McDonald's saying they use recycled paper: only a tiny per cent of it is. The truth is it takes 800 square miles of forest just to keep them supplied with paper for one year. Tons of this end up littering the cities of 'developed' countries.)



COLONIAL INVASION



Not only are McDonald's and many other corporations contributing to a major ecological catastrophe, they are forcing the tribal peoples in the rainforests off their ancestral territories where they have lived peacefully, without damaging their environment, for thousands of years. This is a typical example of the arrogance and viciousness of multinational companies in their endless search for more and more profit. It's no exaggeration to say that when you bite into a Big Mac, you're helping McDonald's empire to wreck this planet.



What's so unhealthy about McDonald's food?



McDONALD's try to show in their 'Nutrition Guide' (which is full of impressive-looking but really quite irrelevant facts & figures) that mass-produced hamburgers, chips, colas & milkshakes, etc., are a useful and nutritious part of any diet. What they don't make clear is that a diet high in fat, sugar, animal products and salt (sodium), and low in fibre, vitamins and minerals - which describes an average McDonald's meal - is linked with cancers of the breast and bowel, and heart disease. This is accepted medical fact, not a cranky theory. Every year in Britain, heart disease alone causes about 18,000 deaths.



FAST = JUNK



Even if they like eating them, most people recognise that processed burgers and synthetic chips, served up in paper and plastic containers, is junk-food. McDonald's prefer the name 'fast-food'. This is not just because it is manufactured and served up as quickly a possible - it has to be eaten quickly too. It's a sign of the junk-quality of Big Macs that people actually hold competitions to see who can eat one in the shortest time.



PAYING FOR THE HABIT



Chewing is essential for good health, as it promotes the flow of digestive juices which break down the food and send nutrients into the blood. McDonald's food is so lacking in bulk it is hardly possible to chew it. Even their own figures show that a 'quarter-pounder' is 48% water. This sort of fake food encourages over-eating, and the high sugar and sodium content can make people develop a kind of addiction - a 'craving'. That means more profit for McDonald's, but constipation, clogged arteries and heart attacks for many customers.



GETTING THE CHEMISTRY RIGHT



McDONALD's stripy staff uniforms, flashy lighting, bright plastic décor, 'Happy Hats' and muzak, are all part of the gimmicky dressing-up of low-quality food which has been designed down to the last detail to look and feel and taste exactly the same in any outlet anywhere in the world. To achieve this artificial conformity, McDonald's require that their 'fresh lettuce leaf', for example, is treated with twelve different chemicals just to keep it the right colour at the right crispness for the right length of time. It might as well be a bit of plastic.



How do McDonald's deliberately exploit children?



NEARLY all McDonald's advertising is aimed at children. Although the Ronald McDonald 'personality' is not as popular as their market researchers expected (probably because it is totally unoriginal), thousands of young children now think of burgers and chips every time they see a clown with orange hair.



THE NORMALITY TRAP



No parent needs to be told how difficult it is to distract a child from insisting on a certain type of food or treat. Advertisements portraying McDonald's as a happy, circus-like place where burgers and chips are provided for everybody at any hour of the day (and late at night), traps children into thinking they aren't 'normal' if they don't go there too. Appetite, necessity and - above all - money, never enter into the 'innocent' world of Ronald McDonald. Few children are slow to spot the gaudy red and yellow standardised frontages in shopping centres and high streets throughout the country. McDonald's know exactly what kind of pressure this puts on people looking after children. It's hard not to give in to this 'convenient' way of keeping children 'happy', even if you haven't got much money and you try to avoid junk-food.



TOY FOOD



As if to compensate for the inadequacy of their products, McDonald's promote the consumption of meals as a 'fun event'. This turns the act of eating into a performance, with the 'glamour' of being in a McDonald's ('Just like it is in the ads!) reducing the food itself to the status of a prop.



Not a lot of children are interested in nutrition, and even if they were, all the gimmicks and routines with paper hats and straws and balloons hide the fact that the food they're seduced into eating is at best mediocre, at worst poisonous - and their parents know it's not even cheap.



RONALD'S DIRTY SECRET



ONCE told the grim story about how hamburgers are made, children are far less ready to join in Ronald McDonald's perverse antics. With the right prompting, a child's imagination can easily turn a clown into a bogeyman (a lot of children are very suspicious of clowns anyway). Children love a secret, and Ronald's is especially disgusting.



In what way are McDonald's responsible for torture and murder?



THE menu at McDonald's is based on meat. They sell millions of burgers every day in 35 countries throughout the world. This means the constant slaughter, day by day, of animals born and bred solely to be turned into McDonald's products. Some of them - especially chickens and pigs - spend their lives in the entirely artificial conditions of huge factory farms, with no access to air or sunshine and no freedom of movement. Their deaths are bloody and barbaric.



MURDERING A BIG MAC



In the slaughterhouse, animals often struggle to escape. Cattle become frantic as they watch the animal before them in the killing-line being prodded, beaten, electrocuted and knifed. A recent British government report criticised inefficient stunning methods which frequently result in animals having their throats cut while still fully conscious. McDonald's are responsible for the deaths of countless animals by this supposedly humane method. We have the choice to eat meat or not. The 450 million animals killed for food in Britain every year have no choice at all. It is often said that after visiting an abattoir, people become nauseous at the thought of eating flesh. How many of us would be prepared to work in a slaughterhouse and kill the animals we eat?



WHAT'S YOUR POISON?



MEAT is responsible for 70% of all food-poisoning incidents, with chicken and minced meat (as used in burgers) being the worst offenders. When animals are slaughtered, meat can be contaminated with gut contents, faeces and urine, leading to bacterial infection. In an attempt to counteract infection in their animals, farmers routinely inject them with doses of antibiotics. These, in addition to growth-promoting hormone drugs and pesticide residues in their feed, build up in the animals' tissues and can further damage the health of people on a meat-based diet.



What's it like working for McDonald's?



THERE must be a serious problem: even though 80% of McDonald's workers are part-time, the annual staff turnover is 60% (in the USA it's 300%). It's not unusual for their restaurant-workers to quit after just four or five weeks. The reasons are not hard to find.



NO UNIONS ALLOWED



Workers in catering do badly in terms of pay and conditions. They are at work in the evenings and at weekends, doing long shifts in hot, smelly, noisy environments. Wages are low and chances of promotion minimal. To improve this through Trade Union negotiation is very difficult: there is no union specifically for these workers, and the ones they could join show little interest in the problems of part-timers (mostly women). A recent survey of workers in burger-restaurants found that 80% said they needed union help over pay and conditions. Another difficulty is that the 'kitchen trade' has a high proportion of workers from ethnic minority groups who, with little chance of getting work elsewhere, are wary of being sacked



- as many have been - for attempting union organisation. McDonald's have a policy of preventing unionisation by getting rid of pro-union workers. So far this has succeeded everywhere in the world except Sweden, and in Dublin after a long struggle.



TRAINED TO SWEAT



It's obvious that all large chain-stores and junk-food giants depend for their fat profits on the labour of young people. McDonald's is no exception: three-quarters of its workers are under 21. The production-line system deskills the work itself: anybody can grill a hamburger, and cleaning toilets or smiling at customers needs no training. So there is no need to employ chefs or qualified staff - just anybody prepared to work for low wages. As there is no legally-enforced minimum wage in Britain, McDonald's can pay what they like, helping to depress wage levels in the catering trade still further. They say they are providing jobs for school-leavers and take them on regardless of sex or race. The truth is McDonald's are only interested in recruiting cheap labour - which always means that disadvantaged groups, women and black people especially, are even more exploited by industry than they are already."


When I first started contributing to this newsgroup I naturally thought its name, alt.food.wine, meant that discussions would be about food and / or wine - I was misinformed. Perhaps the poster thought the same - I'm happy this time to give them the benefit of the doubt. And no I don't want to start a discussion about what wine goes best with a big mc...

Martin

----- Original Message ----- From: "BallroomDancer" Newsgroups: alt.food.wine Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 2:44 AM Subject: Re: McLibel case: the text McDonald's sued over

I beg to differ. Dom 1964 would easily play the trick.

M.

PETA is actaully against the consumption of most wines (they have a list of acceptable ones), due to the fact that most fining agents are animal-derived.

No joke.

Wow. Really? Forgive my ignorance as I have never made wine, but I thought the most common fining agent for wine was bentonite based but gelatin was occasionally used - more in white wines than red.

I'm going to do a search, but do you happen to have a link to the site of which you are speaking (with the accepted wine list)?

Are there any production winemakers here that could chime in?

Wow - I never figured this thread would actually go somewhere wine related.

formatting link

This is a PETA.org site, even though the URL doesn't indicate that. For the record, I'm not in any way linked with PETA. I think animals are tasty.

I am curious though, what wine goes best with soybeans? Can soybeans be prepared in enough different ways so that they pair with different varietals? Just kidding :)

- Chris

I like soybeans stuffed into venison particularly if stuffed by the deer itself for about two months prior to hunting season. I think that would be my favorite wine friendly preparation of soybeans. This method also works quite well on gamebirds.

Of course; I was making a reference to _Sideways_ :-)

Though I received a healthy dose of ridicule from my friends there for doing so, I made sure to visit McDonald's once when in Paris. I found that it was better than in the US, at least the one sample I had.

Dana

"Dana H. Myers" wrote in news:XPedncW2IoBKB47fRVn- snipped-for-privacy@comcast.com:

When I was a college student travelling in Europe I was in Munich. I overheard some American students saying they would meet later in McDonalds. I said "Are you crazy? You are in Germany and you are going to a McDonalds?" They said it was great and not like the McDs in the US. They were right. In the US they are "100% Beef". In other countries they put spices in the burgers and they are much better.

I had a burger a restaurant once and thought "This is great. The only thing that would make it better is a vintage Bordeaux from my cellar." I'll take a good hamburger over a bad steak any day.

Fred.

P.S I am a member of PETA: People Eating Tasty Animals. Motto: If God had not meant for us to eat animals, why did he make them taste like meat?

Actually there are a number of animal based fining agents. Gelatin comes from animal collagen. Isinglass comes from Stureon air bladders. Casein comes from milk. Albumen from egg whites. I don't think they use beef blood anymore.

yeah, i knew those were animal based - I just thought the synthetic ones were cheaper, better, and more widely used. But, like I said, I have no experience in the matter and really don't even know how that assumption got in my head. Seems like maybe I read it somewhere, heard it in conversation, or maybe dreamt it. :)

A friend and I are founding members of CARROTS — the Camapign Against Robbing Rabbits Of Their Salads. He has one pub where we lunch so well trained that a request for Ham Salad produces Gammon, a couple of eggs, Cumberland Sausage and a large plate of chips. When questioned by wife he may well say that he ordered the Ham Salad.

Tim Hartley

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required