The Fat Duck (very long)

Dec 14, 2005 11 Replies

As promised, here's a report on our meal at the Fat Duck tonight. Sadly Jacquie (my OH) still had a migraine, so our party was reduced to three. That's better than two parties, who having booked there simply failed to turn up at all. (I'm delighted to say that they still had to pay a considerable proportion of what they'd have paid for the meal).



We were welcomed very warmly by the young maître d'hôte, and seated in the small dining room (about 45 covers maximum). As we'd had a sherry beforehand we refused aperitifs, so passed directly on to choosing which menu. Both menus, the chef's tasting menu and the table d'Hôte, were at the same price of £97 and so, as all at the table had to have the same, we chose the former. My brother & I both decided to have the chefs suggested wines and my sister in law, who was driving us home limited herself to one glass of wine, and wasn't disappointed with the Kiralyudvar Tokaji Furmint 2002 that I picked out for her. We started with four amuse bouche courses.



Nitro-green tea and lime mousse. This consisted of an egg white mousse, infused with green tea and lime, together with some vodka, all shaken up in a whipped cream bomb, and piped into a meringue shape which was quick frozen at the table in liquid nitrogen. Fascinating texture crunchy crisp at the outside and soft inside, with a green tea attack, finishing with the lime. Lovely, and not badly matched by the Barbadillo manzanilla sherry "En Rama" (unfiltered), though the wine was so bone dry that the slight sweetness of the mousse was accentuated. The sherry itself was lovely, bone dry but full of flavour and character. We were then served a surprise. Two little jelly squares, one orange the other red, described as orange and beetroot, with strict instructions to try the orange one first. I couldn't get any flavour of orange on it hesitating between mango and shellfish! The red one was hugely powerful, and I quickly got it as a blood orange jelly. It turned out that the orange jelly was made from golden beetroot. That slightly teasy element often appeared through the menu. Heston Blumenthal doesn't take himself or his guests too seriously though his food is itself extremely serious.



After this little excursion, we returned to the amuse bouches proper, with oyster, passion fruit jelly and horseradish cream and lavender, The oyster was a "Native" from Colchester. I loved it, finding it meaty and delicious, Tony & Gay were unenthusiastic, but then, they don't much like oyster. The combination with the jelly was very interesting, more successful than other sweet ingredients with oysters I've had. The horseradish cream was delicate and delightful and accompanied the oyster well. The match with the sherry was OK, but no better IMO.



Then came a Pommery grain mustard ice cream served surrounded by a lake (all of 8 cms across) of red cabbage gazpacho. The Gazpacho was a delight (bread went into it somewhere) served with the mustard ice cream in a little spoon moulded dollop in the middle. The ice cream has practically no sweetness, and the flavour of the mustard sort of crept up on you. We all thought the gazpacho was a triumph. Wine match was poor.



The last of the amuse bouches was the most way out. Jelly of quail, on a bed of pea puree, with some langoustine cream on top, and on top of that a "parfait of foie gras". Being good boys and girls, when the waiter told us to take single mouthfuls containing all four elements, we did! the effect was simply magic, with each contributing to make a harmonious whole. Simply delightful. That said, I can't say I noticed the presence of the langoustine in the cream. Gay doesn't agree!



Now came the first course of the meal itself. Blumenthal's famous Snail Porridge. Served with 2002 Savennieres Vieux Clos - Joly. A splendid wine from a difficult year, where the challenge was to get enough balancing acidity. Thanks to his espousal of biodynamics and to ruthless yield reduction down to only 15Hl/Ha, he succeeded admirably. A lovely bone dry wine with the honeyed finish typical of a Savennieres, The name of Snail Porridge is designed to tease and challenge, and in fact I don't think there was anything TOO way out about the dish. Closer to a risotto in texture than a porridge, the grain was heavily flavoured with a puree of parsley, and the snails (petit gris, sourced locally) simmered for 4-5 hours till tender and arranged on top, with some finely grated slivers of Joselito ham mixed into the risotto, and the whole topped with shaved fennel. The dish was delicious, with all elements marrying harmoniously. The wine went wonderfully well with it. As a counsel of perfection, I'd have preferred it if the snails were a little more positive in flavour though they went very well with the other ingredients. The ham, on the other hand was pretty well eclipsed. I don't think I was able to detect its presence, but perhaps the dish might well have been lessened without it.



During the introduction to the meal, the Maître D had explained that if any of us had a marked aversion to any of the dishes, we should say so and that they would be flexible in their response, although they would only serve the Tasting Menu to the whole table, As Gay hates snails she was given a choice of the carte, and chose a dish of seared scallop with a roasted cauliflower puree and oloroso jelly. Magnificent. One of the best scallop dishes any of us have ever tasted.



Next came another of Heston Blumenthal's "signature dishes". Roast Foie Gras with almond fluid gel, cherry and camomile. A little rectangular block of fresh foie gras about 3 cms by 3cms in cross section and about 5-6 cms in length, served with two lines of a cherry sauce, a swirl of an almondy mousse, and tiny cubes of amaretto jelly, This was served with the same wine as Gay had, Tokaji Furmint



2002 from Kiralyudvar. this is a wine which had won a prize as "best Hungarian dry white" and was magic. Perfectly balanced, fuller and richer than any dry Furmint I've ever tasted. I hadn't thought the wine spent some time in barrel, but on the mouth, the complexity was such that it tasted as if it had. It was, again (yawn - boring) a splendid match with the dish.

It's hard to say if all the components were essential to show up the quality of the foie gras, or whether this would have shown better on its own or what. The foie gras was barely warm - it had been poached at 55C in advance, and then seared on all sides for a few seconds before being dished. No criticism of the presentation, foie gras like that is delightful. Tony and I, on the other hand, both agreed that we had eaten better duck liver, though we were assured by the Maître D that it was the very finest, sourced from the Gers in south west France. While accepting without hesitation that it was what he said it was, I remain unenthused about the foie gras itself. The dish, taken as a whole was fascinating, and very successful, but not necessarily better than the escalopes of fg I've had in other places - or cooked for myself, for that matter.



Next came Heston Blumenthal's experiment in Umami. "Sardine on toast Sorbet". Ballotine of mackerel 'invertebrate' marinated daikon. The mackerel was boned, and reconstituted before being sliced across into a 1/4" slice across the body. The sardine was served as a little olive shaped ice cream (not really a sorbet, IMO) and the dish was accompanied by a Sake, Tainetsu, Taksago, Junmai Ginjo. Immensely savoury, I was expecting to dislike this dish, not being a great fan of raw fishes, but in fact, I liked it very much indeed. I can't say I picked up on the 'toast' but the rest was spot on. A lovely dish, which was again perfectly complemented and brought into focus by the sake.



Next came the fish course. This was "Salmon poached with Liquorice". Simple name for a complex dish! The salmon was beautiful, very lightly cooked, but subtle and delicate. It was served enrobed by a very heavily set liquorice jelly, that was just a little sweet from the liquorice, and some liquorice root grated over it. The large plate was "seeded" with little pips of pink grapefruit and dots of proper balsamic vinegar and had two grilled asparagus spears as garnish. I quite liked the jelly, though Gay didn't at all. What was interesting was that fishiness of the salmon was very much in the background, with the dominant flavour being the "salmoniness", though again that wasn't as big as most salmon I've eaten - very muted.. Again, a delightful dish, perfectly complemented by the wine. I have to eat my words. I had a big red wine, with relatively low acidity that went wonderfully well with the fish. 2001 La Grola IGT from the Veneto, made by Allegrini. The dominant grape was Vermentino, (I think, though I have just been met with blank stares when I asked for confirmation). Anyway this was a lovely full comforting wine, that almost tasted as if it had some sweetness, virtually without tannins, it was a delight and a discovery for me.



Next came "Poached breast of Anjou Pigeon pancetta" Served with a "pastilla of its leg, cocoa and quatre épices". Served with Domaine Duclaux Côte Rôtie 2002. The wine was lovely, much more forward than I'd expect of a 3 year old Côte Rôtie, though Tony & I agreed that it would have been showing better in 3 or 4 years' time, Prunes, cherries and truffles on the mouth and nose. Very long. The pigeon was lovely and the marriage excellent, The breast was very pink, tender and tasty, with the legs very tender being cooked a long time under fat, and wrapped in a crispy triangle of filo type pastry. The dish was garnished with what looked like little caramelised pistachios coated in quatres épices but which were in fact a mixture of them and bits of cocoa beans. Lovely & subtle.



After this came a little interlude. First we had Mrs Marshall's Margaret Cornet. Mrs Marshall was a pioneer in ice cream making in Victorian times, and the ice cream was an apple ice cream with ginger, served in a little cornet. Delicious, Then followed "Pine sherbet fountain". This was exactly that, a sherbet, with a tube of what seemed to be hollow vanilla pod, served in a little cardboard tube, just like the sherbet fountains of our youth, What set it apart was the quite pronounced pine flavour, as you get in retsina but not as rough as in that. The waiter explained that this was to prepare our palates for the next course, which followed.



Mango and Douglas Fir Puree, with a bavarois of lychee and mango, blackcurrant sorbet. Served with a 1989 Scharzhofberger Beerenauslese from von Kasselstadt. The wine was magnificent, with just the acidity that a wine from the Saar should have in a great year. Again, I had to abandon another couple of my preconceptions, which are that one shouldn't accompany an ice with wine, and that top german wines are best served on their own!! Two shibboleths in one course isn't bad! The dish was oddly named, in that there were two tiny blobs of mango and douglas fir, with a decent sized portion of a two layer bavarois, and a fair sized olive of a magnificent blackcurrant sorbet. However unlike some previous attempts I've tasted which failed to marry up tropical fruits, this one succeeded admirably, The match with the wine was superb, the dish was a wonderful pallet of tropical fruits with the douglas fir element showing nicely in it.



We then moved to a tiny between course nonsense, which consisted of a little square jelly of beetroot, very concentrated and sweet but with good balancing acidity, and "Carrot and orange tuile", served like a lolly on a stick!! there wasn't much of it, and it was hard to see what it had to say either about carrots or anything else. It wasn't unpleasant, perfectly nice in fact, but one failed to see what role it was supposed to play.



Another added fantasy appeared, that wasn't on the menu. Playing on the idea of the following course, which was that of "breakfast bacon and eggs", they served us the Fat Duck's cereal. This was served out of little cardboard "cereal boxes", and consisted of wafer thin flakes of crispy dried parsnip, to which we added "parsnip milk" (milk infused with parsnip). A delightful nonsense.



We then moved on to another of Heston Blumenthal's signature pieces, "Smoked bacon and egg ice cream with pain perdu and tea jelly", but in addition they had added a little olive shaped salt butter caramel, to make a trio on the plate. The ice cream tasted of smoked bacon and egg, and worked remarkably well. The pain perdu was a delight, with the brioche being soaked in custard, before being cut into rectangles fried on all sides and then dipped into powdered caramel. Gorgeous. The salt butter caramel was very good, sticky and concentrated. This was served with what was described as a 2002 Vin Santo Sigalas from Santorini, though the Italian waitress said it shouldn't really have been called vin Santo! The grapes were air dried in the sun (rather like a recioto, but out in the open) before being vinified. Little or no hint of volatile acidity which one often gets in such wines, and a great mouthful of nectar with a hint of caramel/toffee. Nearly mega yummy. Excellent match again. The green tea jelly was lovely and was sharpened with something, which I thought was lemon, but to tease, the waiter didn't tell us! Might have been lime.



Finally, (yes all good things have to come to an end) we had the "hot and cold tea with violet tartlets. This was just that, A glass of very cold earl gray tea jelly cut in half from top to bottom and the other half heated and poured back in! It was carefully aligned in front of us so that in drinking it, we simultaneously had both hot and cold tea in our mouths at the same time. Amusing. The tartlets were filled with what seemed like the same caramel as we'd had in the previous course.



Whew. We enjoyed the meal enormously, but this would never please someone who doesn't enjoy thinking about their food and having their conceptions challenged.



One of the most notable features of the restaurant was the excellence of the staff. The service was wonderful, with attentive well trained staff. The Maître D told us that every Sunday, they have to arrive an hour early for tasting and training. We counted at least 6 different nationalities. All they had in common was an amazing level of knowledge about both the food and the wines, a genuine desire to please & to welcome, and a slightly mischievous pleasure in teasing us with the novelty of the dishes and the combinations. We had a great time, and would be happy to go there again - though possibly to try the A la Carte menu this time to see what they could do with more "mainstream" preparation and presentation. It is worth pointing out that everyone in the place was taking the chef's tasting menu, however. Clientele was mixed with very few people who were obviously there to be seen at the "in" place.



All the best Ian (who'll probably be out of touch until Saturday)


Thanks for taking the time to post such a comprehensive report - all of which I echo & agree with from our visit a few months ago.

I'll amplify/comment on a couple of points:

My brother & I both decided to have the

One of our party does not drink red wine (migraines) so had the Champagne Tasting menu instead - and was not disappointed!

Breathe out as you crunch and the table disappears in a puff of "nitrogen smoke" and the rest of the part convulses in laughter!

We spent the whole meal spotting the "joke" or "play" in each course.

The two jellies on was good but also the tiny tiny cubes of Almond flavoured jelly (no bigger than a match head) which exploded into a head filling explosion of flavour was the favourite on our table

Agree on both - though to be fair matching with any wine would have been difficult

!

A great example of Heston not taking himself too seriously. He has said that if he had called it "Fricassee d'escargot with Barley Risotto" it would have been hailed as triumph instead of curiosity

Ahhhh, the almond gel!

This was the one are we thought the menu had wrong. Unanimously we thought the dish it self was "off the pace" of the rest of the meal BUT paired with the Sake it was superb, the combination was truly perfect. Our view was that the Sake should be served as part of the dish not an addition in the wine menu. .

150% agreement. Very much a Love it or Hate it experience with little scope for the middle ground

Snap!!! We are already planning another trip. Which will be our third. Set lunch the first time, tasting menu recently , a la carte next time. It is

*that* good!

Not the same on the two lunch times we have eaten there. 50/50 split at a guess.

pk

Ian

sounds fantastic.

What is the lead time (how many months ahead does one have to reserve)?

Mike

PS, I did not get the shibboleth bit, did you have to give a secret password to dr> As promised, here's a report on our meal at the Fat Duck tonight.

Great report, thanks Ian. Sorry Jacquie had to miss that!

Are you going for El Bulli next?

Couple of wines notes:

"2002 Savennieres ....a difficult year, where the challenge was to get enough balancing acidity."

Really? My impression was that 2002 was a knockout year in Savennieres, the first since '96/'97 that combined good ripeness and good acidity. Certainly the Baumard and Closel wines shone.

"2001 La Grola IGT from the Veneto, made by Allegrini. The dominant grape was Vermentino, (I think, though I have just been met with blank stares when I asked for confirmation)."

Hmmm, the blank stares were probably because Vermentino is a white wine grape. I'm pretty sure La Grola is all or mostly Corvina. :)

Great report, glad to have you back posting.

Thank you for such a detailed report, Ian, and taking the time to write it. Please pass on to Jacquie our most sincere sympathies: migraines are no fun at any time, but to miss such a special meal must have added insult to injury (literally). I do wonder whether I would find the cooking too precious for my tastes, but -- having fairly recently eaten and enjoyed the tasting menu at Manresa in CA -- I am willing to give The Fat Duck the benefit of the doubt.

Do you mean the *2003*? From what I know, I would never have characterized 2002 as a difficult year in the Loire, nor a year in which acidity would be an issue. I'm also surprised that so young a Savennieres was served: is it the low acids that made it possible, or is this a wine meant to be served young?

I would have guessed that Corvina would be the major grape used, with some Molinara and Rondinella, but what do I know? ;-) I'm a bit surprised that you found this (relatively) low in acid, but it all depends on what you standard of comparison is, I suppose. I too wouldn't have thought of serving a red from the Veneto with salmon -- do you think that the preparation rendered the fish less oily than usual?

Of everything you described here, this one was the dish and pairing that caught my attention. It *does* sound fantastic, though like you I'm shocked by how young the Cote-Rotie was (forward year, though). I'm unfamiliar with that producer. Is it a "modern," barrique-aged Cote-Rotie, or a more traditional style?

Douglas fir???? Please do explain, Ian! How is a Christmas tree incorporated into food? or is this another case of two nations separated by a common language? ;-)

Yes, nor I suspect would it please someone who doesn't enojy eating at a leisurely pace. How long were you at the table? 3 hours? 4??

Some comments about the wine list: • The biggest holdings are in (surprise, surprise!) White Burgundy and Red Bordeaux, neither of which IMO goes terribly well with the cooking at the Fat Duck. • Their holdings from Germany and Austria are woeful by comparison, despite those wines being far more seviceable with the cuisine. • Why so many Aussie reds? Surely, they would be among my last choices with the foods you desribe. • For such a presitigious restaurant, I was disappointed to see so few aged wines on the list: nearly everything (aside from their clarets) were from the last 2-3 years. • The markups looked quite reasonable... until I remembered that the prices were in £ :(

Again, thanks for such an interesting report! Mark Lipton

Two calendar months. Applied very strictly.

When I booked a few months ago I sat redialling for 90 minutes before getting through!

pk

I noticed same thing, but I'll bet you're right, that he meant 2003.

I think of La Grola as a rather lush woody wine, indeed low-acid.

Uh , you missed that '83 Rousseau Ruchottes (for about 800 pounds)

Indeed, I though same thing! $79 for 2000 Mugnier Chambolle or Lafarge VS is pretty reasonable, but 79 pounds = $140!

DALE WILLIAMS wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ack!! I think you forgot to change your identity settings in OE for this post, Dale. Prepare for the barrage of spambots :(

Mmm.. I see. I haven't had La Grola, but was thinking of Valpos in general. No wonder Parker likes this so much. Is that true of Allegrini's other IGTs, too?

I did say *few*, not none. I felt that it was especially acute in the Loire whites and N. Rhone reds, where a bit of bottle age is more or less obligatory for enjoyment. Oh, and all the CNdPs were from '98'-'01 and should be thoroughly asleep now (maybe not the '99). OTOH, there was usually one fully aged bottle in each category and quite a few aged clarets... all priced in the stratosphere, of course ;-)

Do you think they permit BYO? :p

Mark "cheapskate" Lipton

So were all of us. however, she's better, and I think it's likely that as a consolation, we'll all be going to HB's hotel/pub there to see what his take is on trad british food.

No. This was fascinating, but as far out as I want to go. As Michael T knows, I do prefer the food to sing of the ingredients, and in this type of cooking, it sings more of the interest one can get in matching unusual pairings.

No, I'm a dumbo. it was the 2003. Sorry. But it was lovely.

Oh - bums, I wish I'd made a note from the bottle. I'm not up on italian grape varieties at all, and I didn't think to note it down. Maybe the Vermentino was a minor player, or maybe I'm simply raving.

Thanks very much. I have to say that although I read regularly, I really have so little to contribute about many of the threads about wines of which I'm almost totally ignorant, that I don't feel I should bore you with my irrelevancies and inaccuracies!

Very possibly, though it's equally possible that you'd enter HB's game and enjoy it at it's own level.

I was astonished that it was showing as well, too. I'm sure that you're right.

I guess so, though I don't know how he got the salmon so un-oily. It may have been the liquorice jelly surrounding it, or the cooking, I simply don't know. I've had quite a lot of salmon from very good to awful, and this was completely different to any I've had. Light in flavour. My guess was that this was cool poached at 55C. All I know was that the soft slight sweetness of the wine went FAR better than I expected. In fact, with hindsight the outstanding thing about this course was the match, rather than the excellence of the dish itself.

I don't know, Mark, though from the taste of it, I'd have to vote for modern.

No, in this case (as in the case of the sherbet) he really did somehow get the flavour of the conifer into the dish. Goodness knows what he did, but especially in the little blobs of puree, there was a definite and quite unmistakeable odour and flavour of the tree. Probably made an infusion, and incorporated that.

we sat down at 7pm and left our table well before 11pm, so we spent something like three and a half hours at table. To be honest Mark, as you know from dinners at my house, 3 hours is not a time that I find in any way out of the ordinary. The dinner itself is supposed to be what you do for the evening, instead of a preamble or postlude to something else. but you're absolutely right that someone who expects to be in and out inside a couple of hours at most would find the time dragging. However I must say that the first four amuse bouche courses were served at a cracking pace. Things did slow down afterwards, which was just as well or we'd not have had time to drink our wines.

To those who commented on the wine prices. Yes. They were awful. A Montrachet from Lafon at £2500 is wicked.

I'd not disagree with any of these comments. I spent the first half hour there with the wine list on my knees trying to look at it between the amuse bouches, and so didn't really have the time to gain an overall impression. What's interesting - for me - is that the make up of the wines in the tasting was not at all typical of the list as a whole. Tom S asked me privately how my meal compared with that which we had at the French Laundry. I find myself in some difficulty. T.F.D. is not in the same gastronomic world as T.F.L. Heston B is to some extent making jokes and teasing with everything he does, there's a real playfulness about both dishes and names, that almost disguises his magnificent subtlety of palate. However, T.F.L. is in a far more classical vein, and I think that if I had to choose to have a tasting menu again at just one of them, then other things being equal, I'd go with Keller. But I'd like to taste the A la Carte at the Fat Duck first.

ATB Ian

2 months on the nose, as for TFL. my brother Tony managed to get a reservation without any trouble, however.

Have I misused the word? Oops Yes I have. (By the way, I heartily recomend reading Wikepedia on the true meaning of the word. Fascinating). What I meant to say was that it was an act of faith for me to believe that no wine should be served with ice cream and that top German wines are best served alone I was referring to these quasi religious beliefs which was shattered by my experience tasting the match.

Serves me right for trying to be clever!

"Ian Hoare" wrote .............

Ian, after such a mouthwatering review, you are forgiven.

Hopefully you will tune in to afw sometime in the next few days - The Lady Kathryn and I extend to both you and [the now recovered] Mme. Jacquie our very very best wishes for the festive season, from the Antipodes, where we are bathing in summer sunshine.

We are heading off to Kawau Island [remember?] for Xmas luncheon on the deck, overlooking the cove [ Metrosideros in full flower!] with Brian and Chic - I shall drink a glass of champagne to your excellent health.

Best wishes

A

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required