cabernet must adjustments

Hi there.

I just bought 250 pounds of Peter Brehm cabernet grapes from northern California. They were harvested September 21 with a Brix of 26.5, pH of 3.41 and TA of 7.95 grams/litre.

The brix seems a little high as does the acid. Any suggestions on how you would adjust this must? Just ferment out and ML and cold stabalize to reduce acid? Should I add acidulated water to bring the brix down? Or just plain water?

Any advice appreciated.

Dan Emerson

Reply to
Dan Emerson
Loading thread data ...

First, retest the sugar, pH and acid, before any adjustments. Mistakes can be made.

The Brix is a bit high (about 15.5% p.a.). If you use an alcohol-tolerant yeast, you can reduce the alcohol level by stirring the must somewhat vigorously during fermentation. Depends how low you want to get it.

The pH is ideal (IMO) for a cabernet, and I would be hesitant to adjust it at all. If you reduce it very much, it will be more difficult to initiate malolactic fermentation.

The acid is about .15 higher than I would like to have for a cabernet, but it should come down during fermentation, cold stabilization, and malolactic fermentation. How much is anyone's guess, but it's not unreasonable to expect a .15 reduction.

If you do decide to reduce the Brix via dilution, I think plain (or distilled) water would be better than acidulated, since that will reduce the TA a bit. Acidulated would increase it.

Reply to
Negodki

Although the Brix is a little high, the other numbers are *perfect*! Should make a big Cabernet. Don't mess with it; just ferment it as is.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

Thanks for all the advice. I'll just let it go with minimum intervention other than cultured yeast.

I have a question about pressing.

I generally press when the brix is zero, or the gravity is 1.0 or less. There is usually still a cap. Should I wait until the cap falls? I've heard about falling cap but have never seen this. Impatient or a worry wart I guess.

If I wait until the cap falls, do I have to use an inert gas? What about pressing after the cap falls. Pressing seems so violent.

When I press, I generally scoop the whole mess, juice and pulp into the press and press away. Should I try to try to wait until the cap falls and try to draw off the juice from the pulp before pressing?

I want my wines, cabernet and pinot, to have that big mouth feel (which at least my Pinot doesn't have) and I think my past pressing practices may play a part. Also, I don't use barrels, and that may be part of it too.

In other words: What are the keys to making a very fine Cabernet. I think I have good grapes and I don't have a barrel.

Thanks for all your help.

Dan Emerson

Reply to
Dan Emerson

oxidation).

The "special methods" aren't all that complicated. It's just a matter of keeping air away from the wine and stirring the must to keep it from going reductive (H2S). I spritz the top of the must and then smooth a trash bag down against the surface of the must. Laying a few pieces of wood down on the plastic to keep it in contact with the wine helps. That keeps air away pretty well.

That's not necessarily true. Pressing at zero Brix will tend to yield a wine with harsher tannins than pressing a couple of weeks beyond dryness. The extended maceration encourages polymerization of harsh tannins into big, soft tannins. Also, the color tends to be reabsorbed by the pulp during extended maceration.

Pressing isn't a problem. The aeration is good for a young wine - especially a red. Prior to and after pressing it is necessary to take protective measures with the wine (topping up, inert gas, sulfiting), but not while you're actually pressing it.

Not true! The low rate of CO2 production may lure you into a false sense of security, but if the CO2 gassing is not _considerable_, the surface of the must is a good breeding ground for all the spoilage organisms. They only need a _little_ bit of air to survive and then thrive.

I tend to agree, but I always press a good deal harder than _gently_. There's a lot of good stuff in the heavy press fraction. It might be advisable to keep the heavy press fraction separate for awhile - possibly for a different fining regimen than the free run and light press wine - but I usually end up incorporating it into the main lot.

hard-pressing

See my comments above re differential fining.

The best way to get oak character into glass or stainless fermented wines is to ferment with wood chips in the primary, and carry them along as long as necessary to achieve the desired effect. Sure, barrels are better but you can do _very_ well with just chips and an occasional racking.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

As a home winemaker doing relatively small batches (5 gallons), I am curious about this. I would like to impart oak in some of my wines, but barrels I think are not a good option for these small batches. Thus, I will experiement with chips. I have seen several people here suggest that it is best to put the oak chips in the primary prior to fermentation. But, isn't this actually not what is done with most wines? Are not most commercial wines fermented in vats or steel tanks and then placed into barrels for aging and oaking after primary fermentation? Would not a similar (as much as possible) oaking take place if chips were added after primary?

I would definitely appreciate any comments about the differences between adding chips before or after fermentation - pros, cons?

Thanks.

Reply to
Greg Cook

"integrating"

Exactly right! That's why barrel fermented Chardonnay (e.g.) tastes different from tank fermented Chardonnay that is subsequently barrel aged. The oak flavor is more tightly integrated into the structure of the wine - partly at least because the yeast tends to fine the harsh wood tannins.

Tom S

Reply to
Tom S

Reply to
J Dixon

Excellent information. Thanks for the comments. Would it be safe to say that oaking after fermentation should be done more conservatively since it doesn't integrate as well?

Reply to
Greg Cook

fermentation,

Reply to
J Dixon

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.