ACMD report wants tighter controls on booze & tobacco for teenagers


Young face tougher drink, smoking laws
Call for tighter under-25 drink-drive limit and tobacco ban for under-18s
Alan Travis, home affairs editor Thursday September 14, 2006 The Guardian
A much tougher drink-drive limit for young drivers and a higher legal age at which cigarettes can be bought are needed to tackle the drugs that do most harm to young people, the government's experts on drug policy recommend today.
They want the drink-driving limit for drivers under 25 to be cut by nearly 40% in an attempt to reduce accidents. They also say it is time to raise the legal age for buying tobacco from 16 to 18 and ensure that the underage drinking and smoking laws are much more strictly enforced.
The government's advisory committee on the misuse of drugs (ACMD) says that while it is true that more young people each year are using cannabis on an occasional basis, far larger numbers are becoming addicted to nicotine or drink alcohol frequently and to excess.
The official admission that alcohol and tobacco actually cause far more harm than cannabis and other illicit drugs marks a major departure in the 30-year history of the drug advisory body.
It says the scientific evidence is now clear that alcohol and tobacco have chemical effects on the human brain similar to illegal drugs and they can no longer neglect two of the most harmful mood-changing drugs simply because they are legal.
"Among the 6.8 million 16 to 24-year-olds in the UK, there are an estimated 2.1 million daily smokers, 1.9 million who drink more than twice the recommended amount at least once a week and 1 million who have used an illegal drug in the past month," says the ACMD's report, Pathways to Problems, published today.
It says that although age-related legal curbs on buying drink and tobacco are flouted by large numbers of young people, prosecutions of those who sell alcohol and tobacco to underage customers are very rare - whereas prosecutions for the sale and possession of illegal drugs are common.
The experts recommend:
* It should be an offence to sell tobacco to anyone under 18 instead of 16 and the new limit should be strictly enforced.
* Poorer driving skills and higher accident rates among under-25s mean the drink-drive limit should be cut from 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood to 50mg per 100ml.
* Raising excise duty on alcohol to curb binge drinking. The experts say the real cost of alcohol has been falling and there is strong evidence that making it more expensive would reduce demand.
* Banning alcohol advertising on television and in cinemas showing under-18 films as well as sponsorship of music and sports events watched by teenagers.
* Replacing drug education lessons with repeated campaigns that make young people aware of the hazards of using tobacco, alcohol and other drugs. The report says current drug education has little impact.
* Abandoning attempts to introduce sniffer dogs and drug testing into schools as their impact on pupil-school trust is not offset by the potential gains.
The report says that of all drugs, alcohol has shown the most recent growth in use and causes the most problems among young Britons. It adds: "The most alarming recent development has been the growth in young women who drink frequently and to excess." The number of women drinking more than twice the recommended amount has doubled in a decade.
A government spokesman said smoking by under-15s fell by 9% in 2005 and ministers were already considering raising the legal age to buy cigarettes to 18. Transport minister Stephen Ladyman said the government had no plans to change any of the drink-drive limits.
- - - - - - -
Has this report actually been published yet?
Reply to
Jasbird

On the front page of major newspapers but their press release / report are still not found were expected , nor at Yahoo, MSN or Google (searching for "Pathways to Problems" ACMD).
The Telegraph
The Times
Daily Mail
How irritating can these people get?
Reply to
Jasbird

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.