Reading the thread on wine "traits", it occurred to me that I haven't seen the attribute "drinkability" discussed here; yet this is one of the most important attributes for me. I define drinkability thusly: it is the amount of wine one would consume at a single sitting (evening), without ill effects. Obviously, it depends on the particular person's constitution and drinking habits, which have to be accounted for, but (I think) it reflects some intrinsic property of the wine too, that is independent from all its other taste traits (acidic/sweet/tannic etc.). For me, a wine is undrinkable if I would not consume more than half a bottle (for whatever reasons - bad taste or ill effects), moderately drinkable - one bottle or thereabouts, but no more than one and a half, and highly drinkable - a magnum or more. So do you think this is an objective trait (like acidity), or is it a subjective trait, such that a certain wine, drinkable for somebody, can be undrinkable for someone else? (Note - I can usually tell if the wine is drinkable or not as early as the first sip, or as late as the beginning of the second glass. In the second case, the wine gradually feels weirder and weirder, and I know I have to stop drinking, or else... How do I know, you may ask - simple, by stubbornly ignoring that feeling on some occasions ;) Some examples of some somewhat common wines you might have tasted, together with their drinkability rating (for me, of course):
- Charles Shaw "Two Buck Chuck" (California) - undrinkable
- Zarafa Pinotage (South Africa) - undrinkable
- Little Penguin Chardonnay (Australia) - undrinkable
- Yellowtail Shiraz (Australia) - moderately drinkable
- Rex Goliath 47lb rooster (California?) - moderately drinkable
- Egri Bikaver Bull's blood (Hungary) - highly drinkable
- Castellana Montepulciano D'Abruzzo (Italy) - highly drinkable
- Les Etoiles Shiraz (Vin de pays d'Oc) - highly drinkable
- Pepiere Muscadet (France) - highly drinkable