Hello, Mark! You wrote on Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:56:56 -0700:
ML> DaleW wrote: ??>> Mark, ??>>
??>> ""Cantonese/Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sichuan, Hunan, Beijing ??>> and Nanjing" ??>>
??>> I'm not sure I've ever seen a Nanjing place (similar to ??>> Shanghai?), but can find the others in NYC easily. There ??>> are also some Chiu Chow places, which differ subtlety from ??>> Hong Kong. Plus a couple Tibetan places, which the Chinese ??>> government will tell you are Chinese. :( ??>>
ML> House of Nanjing in SF is my only data point there, but the ML> place is quite well known (and well reputed). Conversely, ML> I've never heard of Chiu Chow, but will have to look for ML> some. And don't get me started about Tibet...
I found another viewpoint on Chinese formal dinners that may also go to explain the poverty of wine lists in the Chinese restaurants that I know. I have lost my note of the book but I can find it again. Apparently a formal Chinese meal, according the author, consists of several courses but only at the second or "liquor" course is drinking both of rice wine and hard liquor customary. It seems that any dinner toasts are also made at that point. I will also admit that I've never been to one and wasn't it at such a dinner that George I passed out?
What happens at restaurants principally catering to a non-Chinese clientele does not have to conform to tradition. I tend to agree that such places might spend a little time on pleasing the customers and providing a selection of wines. I'll also admit that I have rather liked Pacific Rim fusion food for many years even if it is often a bit of a cliché and here the light white wines appropriate, IMHO, to some Thai dishes could be appropriate.