TN: 2000 Chateau Tour Pibran

Price: $25. Cloudy inky-purple color, like concord grape juice used to soak newsprint. Nose of sour cherries with a hint of musty, yeasty home-made bread. Flavor is dominated by harsh tannins with a lack of fruit flavor to offset. This is another example of a poor second Bordeaux being promoted at an outrageous price because it is from the

2000 vintage. A "D" on Dale's grading scheme.

General comment: I have been extremely disappointed with the value of

2000 Bordeaux. I know that there are excellent wines from the vintage, but all are virtually unaffordable for me. I have seen some reference to the "20 year average" for Bordeaux. Does anybody have a quantitative point of reference for how inflated the 2000 Bordeaux prices are, and when, if ever, Bordeaux prices will return to an affordable level? Thanks,

Andy

Reply to
ShortStory
Loading thread data ...

Refer back a couple of weeks ago to the thread about how Bordeaux/France is going to regain their market share....

Reply to
Ronin

Well, first of all $25 for Tour Pibran (second wine of a so-so cru bourgeois!) is outrageous. The problem is the good value wines of 2000 (and there WERE quite a few- I paid between $8 & $20 for Coufran, d'Aiguilhe, Epicurea de Martinat, de Pez, Caronne St. Gemme, De Carles ,Lanessan, Haut-Chaigneau, Potensac, Bernadotte ,Tronquoy-Lalande, Les Trois Croix , Tayac Reserve, Corbin) all sold out quickly, and price was raised on anything left in market.

When you add on weaker dollar (some improvement recently, but still weak) it's hard to see a lot of bargains in the "hot" vintages like

2000 and 2005. I think you'd be better off cherry picking 2001s & 2002s - 2001 Cap de Faugeres, 2002 Gloria, 2002 Lagrange, etc.
Reply to
DaleW

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.