TN: Newsflash! Bojo trumps industrial Californians!

Sunday I joined a group of friends for a nice al fresco dinner. Magnificent setting (they rent a wing of an old mansion, the rest of the house is shuttered) with great grounds, we watched the fireflies - unfortunately the family of skunks who troop by (at a safe distance) were apparently otherwise occupied last night.

Jim had said he was grilling pork loins with a chimichurri sauce from yesterday's NYT magazine, I was bringing appetizers (proscuitto and emlon) decided to bring a light red to go with the pork. So I brought the 2002 Clos de Roilette Fleurie. Unfortunately this slurpable treat didn't make it to the main course, but I at least managed to fill my glass a couple times as it was finished quickly. Nose of wild strawberries and flowers, nicely concentrated red (raspberry/cherry) fruit with a nice clean minerally finish. Beautiful wine, I'm sad I'm down to last few. A-

Things slid a bit from that point on (winewise, the pork was delcious, as were the rice, beans, and grilled pineapple). The hostess's stock wine was out, the 2003 Kendall-Jackson Vintner's Reserve Chardonnay. There' s a bit of sweetness there, if a bit less than I remember from vintages from the 1990s. Bosc pear fruit, a little oak/buttersotch note. Better than I expected - I tend to use KJ Chard as a codeword for "boring bad industrial swill", but not an exciting wine. B-/C+

The 2002 Raymond Estates Merlot (Napa, I think)seemed to have a sweet edge to it, also. Rather thin red plum and blackberry fruit, somewhat short with that edge of sweetness on the finish. C/C+

Actually had a lot of fun, with great people, but mostly drank sparkling water after the Fleurie had fled.

Grade disclaimer: I'm a very easy grader, basically A is an excellent wine, B a good wine, C mediocre. Anything below C means I wouldn't drink at a party where it was only choice. Furthermore, I offer no promises of objectivity, accuracy, and certainly not of consistency

Reply to
DaleW
Loading thread data ...

The 2003 is available for $18. Have you tasted that one yet?

Reply to
Lawrence Leichtman

I passed on the 2003 without tasting. Some tasters I respect reported that it was (like many/most 2003s) a fatter riper rounder version of the 2002. I prefer my Beaujolais on the crisper leaner side, just my tastes- I could see a lot of people preferring the 2003. $18 does seem a little steep, though- I paid $12ish for the 2002.

If you get some 2003, I'd love to see your notes.

Reply to
DaleW

Reply to
Lawrence Leichtman

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.