Using Magnets (Yes Magnets) to Make Wine Taste Better-I was a Sceptic

I am a big time sceptic about gadgets that claim they will make wine taste better. (In the real world I'm a criminal prosecutor for the State of California. I've seen scam after scam in the last 30 years.) Remember the unbelievable claims about aging wine inside a pyramid or a dome? After the San Francisco Fire in 1909, the California Wine Association ran adds about how some of the wine in its cellars improved because of the exposure to the heat of the fire! I thought all these devices and claims were just scams.

I was at a pinot noir tasting (10/06/2004) today that was designed to publicize a neat new book on Pinot Noir (North American Pinot Noir by John Winthrop Haeger, just published by the University of California Press) I got to talking with one of the two Masters of Wine who lives in Orange County, California, Dr Patrick Farrell. He was telling me about a device he (and the inventors) were about to market. It clamps onto the neck of the bottle and causes the wine to go through a magnetic field as it pours out of the bottle. Patrick said with wines that have excess green tannins or green oak tannins the magnets cause them to change their charge, link onto longer molecules that are too big for the receptors on the tongue (I think I got this right) But on well balanced wines-it makes them taste worse.

I'm thinking to myself-"Yeah sure. What's next, black boxes that accumulate orgones?" He brought one of the prototypes into the tasting and darned if it didn't seem to work (I know, I know...placebo effect and all that) All I can say is I told Patrick I wanted one when they become available in a couple of months. (For the whopping price of $19.95, it isn't a big risk. I want to take several wines-pour them from the bottle and then though this device, serve them blind to a group of experienced tasters and see the results (I'll post) For now this is simply a heads up on an oh so interesting gadget. (I have no $$$ interest in this-I hadn't met Patrick until today) I'm just an intrigued wine buff.

If you're interested in getting one when they become available drop a note to Patrick Farrell MW at snipped-for-privacy@surfcity.net

Bob (still shaking my head) Foster, San Diego

Reply to
BFSON
Loading thread data ...

Hi Bob and thanks for an unusual and interesting posting. I have some experience with technical gadgets myself (in the real world I design microelectronic products, and had my first consumer gadget in successful production 32 years ago). Other genres of consumer technology with a non-traditional flavor have demonstrated important merit, and many too have proven out to be absolute junk (despite passionate followings). Honest testing will tell -- good luck with your initiatives there.

"BFSON" in news: snipped-for-privacy@mb-m06.aol.com...

This could be important. It was Haeger who wrote the extraordinary 1998 article "Wine Magnum Force," appearing in Los Angeles Magazine (it can be found online by search), which actually looked at the phenomena of Robert Parker and numerical wine ratings with searching depth and perspective. (Not every writer on such topics today is both inclined and equipped to do so, evidently). Many people have found that article striking. I look forward to checking out this new and longer work on a timely subject. It was the UC Press that published the large landmark UC-Sotheby _Book of California Wine_ in 1984 (Muscatine, Amerine, Thompson, editors), widely available now on the US used market.

-- Max

Reply to
Max Hauser

Once I get my device I plan to find 3 or 4 wines that have either the green tannins or the oaky tannins, pour one glass for each taster right from the bottle and another glass through the device. We will serve them double blind (the tasters won't know the wines, or which wine is in which glass, or even what the varietal is) I'll report back to afw once were done.

BY THE WAY-THE E MAIL ADDRESS IN MY FIRST POST TURNED OUT TO BE WRONG. THE CORRECT ADDRESS FOR PARTICK FARRELL IS snipped-for-privacy@surfcity.net

Bob Foster, San Diego

Reply to
BFSON

Bob, You're right to be skeptical. This is nothing but pseudo-scientific claptrap. He may be a MoW, but he's clearly not someone with much background in the physical sciences. The polymerization of tannins, a real phenomenon, is produced through oxidation or prolonged exposure to acid, neither of which are going to be affected in any way by a magnetic field, no matter how large. In my research, we routinely subject molecules to very high magnetic fields with absolutely no chemical changes induced. Indeed, if this were not so there would be no MRI.

Wow! A Wilhelm Reich reference on Usenet. I'm impressed!

Mark Lipton

Reply to
Mark Lipton

I once dated a girl whose mother was deeply into ALL of William Reich's mumbo-jumbo. Figured out real quick that both Mom and daughter were way too nuts for me.

Bob Foster

Reply to
BFSON

Salut/Hi Mark Lipton,

le/on Thu, 07 Oct 2004 05:20:55 GMT, tu disais/you said:-

Aha!! I'd be MORE impressed if he (also) had no financial interest.

Rather like these magnetic devices claimed to reduce hardness precipitating out in household heating systems? I've seen a number of studies which show them to absolutely, completely and utterly ineffective.

Yes, I was wondering about that. What's more the magnetic field used for MRI is gigantic, to the extent that despite the fact that they were going to scan my _knee_, they were concerned that I might have some ferrous material embedded in my eye. The fields are generated using superconductivity and the apparatus costs millions. I would be surprised if a ceramic magnet could generate enough flux to affect _anything_ fast enough as it passes the field.

Reply to
Ian Hoare

Salut/Hi BFSON,

le/on 07 Oct 2004 04:48:30 GMT, tu disais/you said:-

That _would_ be interesting. Actually, might I suggest matched pairs (by grape vine type) of wines. One which is well balanced, one out of balance. What would be tricky, would be to work out whether your tasting memory was good enough to remember! That would to some extent skew your results.

Reply to
Ian Hoare

So is this the same things as "the Wine Clip"? I've never seen any results from a true double-blind test, despite many requests on various fora to the manufacturers. Dale

Dale Williams Drop "damnspam" to reply

Reply to
Dale Williams

This "Wine Clip" scam was discussed in James Randi's column, it was explained that the weak fields involved could have no effect at all. Please go to

formatting link
and click on commentary archive, scroll down to the Aug 20-2004 article. I think this article talks about Bio-dynamic grape growing as well (poo in a horn).

Reply to
kenneth mccoy

The trial described in this webpage (and my common sense) was sufficient to cause me not to give the thing a second thought.

formatting link

Reply to
Steve Slatcher

Here's a pretty thorough review of the same device, or at least one similar:

formatting link

The following paragraph from the review pretty much sums it up:

"Still, though, when you see 'overwhelming' testimonials from various allegedly respected wine experts regarding the extraordinary qualities of The Wine Clip, and then try it under controlled conditions and find that it doesn't seem to do anything, you've got to wonder how objective these people are actually being. There's no reason to suppose the wine aficionados are any less foolable than hi-fi enthusiasts who're convinced they can hear the difference between cheap and expensive speaker cables even if, unknown to them, the cables are not actually being changed at all."

Larry Coon University of California

Reply to
Larry Coon

That really says it all! I personally believe that no conceivable rationale could be adduced for the effect of magnets on wine and no proponent has ever carried out a proper double blind test. It sort of reminds me of one of the desperation measures of the Florsheim shoe company when they were going broke: selling magnetic insoles for their shoes.

Reply to
James Silverton

Now, had Florsheim just advised buyers to pour their red wine through those insoles...

Hunt

Reply to
Hunt

Hi Ian - I take it that if the principle claimed for these magnetic wine gadgets works then anyone undergoing an MRI scan will end up with longer molecules, become more balanced and taste better? Cheers! Martin

Reply to
Martin Field

I guess someone could sell magnetic inserts for jockstraps .......no, wait - we wouldn't want to either soften or prematurely age THAT, would we??

How silly of me!

Reply to
Bill Spohn

I'd have a little more faith in the dansdata link if he'd used regular, experienced wine tasters and if they had tasted out of something other than plastic cups! Talk about skewing the results by the experimental conditions.

Bob Foster

Reply to
BFSON

That is pretty good proof that the magnets don't work Martin. I have had at least 6 MRIs since April and I am still unbalanced. And Ian, I have 4 stents around my heart and the MRI techs didn't have any problems or warning for me. Bill

Reply to
Bill Loftin
[SNIP]

But Martin, what would happen if one had a bottle of 2001 Bordeaux in their pocket, when they had the MRI?

Hunt

Reply to
Hunt

Also, one bottle of each wine, and swapping the thingie isn't quite emperical either. However, I'm not feeling like taking US$40 (or even $20 for the other one), out of my wine budget to get one and try it with the Riedels. Call me a stingy skeptic, but I'll wait until Laube, or some other deep-pocket type does the complete test.

Hunt

PS Dansdata yielded an entire afternoon of links and extraneous reading, like I needed to surf, rather than work!

Reply to
Hunt

We will try to do the test when I get my device. But I think you do want to use just one bottle of each wine (one glass poured normally, one through the gizmo) Otherwise any differences may simply reflect bottle variation not the effects of the magnets.

Bob (no deep pocket-just curious) Foster

Reply to
BFSON

DrinksForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.