I read Roger Protz's editorial in December's WB about Malcolm Gluck's dismissal of a suggestion from a reader (ukfdra poster Martyn Cornell, I assume you're the same one, Martyn?) that beer might be the better choice to match with food on the limited budget that the article allowed.
the original response has some great & dumb moments, chiefly - "A beautifully confused reader . . . said I should try beer. This is a disgusting idea. Beer does little for most food, especially spicy, complex dishes and even less for the digestion (wine is a protein and thus is more companionable and healthier with food). I'd love to be a fly on the wall (or even in the soup) when, with their dinner four hungry people had to suffer, as Cornell suggests, St Austell Brewery's Clouded Yellow wheat beer followed by Fuller's Golden Pride (my favourite bitter in the world in circumstances where it is appropriate, which is never with food).
Perish the thought . . ." & just to show he has an open mind - "Bouquets or brickbats (but no beers, thank you very much) can be sent to: Tues_Weds_And snipped-for-privacy@guargumdian.co.uk"
full piece at
RP's response at
there's also an RP article on strong beers such as Dogfish Head World Wide Stout (in which after berating Malcolm Gluck for his calling Golden Pride a bitter, he "corrects" this beer's style designation as a barleywine! - not, for example an Imperial Stout?)